<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jarche.com/2018/07/the-perpetual-beta-coffee-club/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2017/02/the-nature-of-reality-a-dialogue-between-a-buddhist-scholar-alan-wallace-and-a-theoretical-physicist.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://crookedtimber.org/2013/02/11/27491/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://digress.it/about/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/05/the-conversation-the-startup-australian-news-site-wants-to-bring-academic-expertise-to-breaking-news/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/interesting_talk/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/scienceenvironment/2306/bedside_manners:_the_broken_spirituality_of_contemporary_us_medical_practice/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=559:conversation-hackers-trolls-argumentation&amp;catid=32:oliviers-blog&amp;Itemid=34"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-07/stopping-the-next-mcveigh/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-long-tail-of-respect/2009/11/05"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970203550604574358643117407778.html#mod=todays_us_weekend_journal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.artofhosting.org/home/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.skelliewag.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2008/06/whats-your-blog.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://2007.recentchangescamp.org/What_to_remember_for_future_events"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://jarche.com/2018/07/the-perpetual-beta-coffee-club/">
    <title>the perpetual beta coffee club</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-24T11:31:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jarche.com/2018/07/the-perpetual-beta-coffee-club/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This year I started the coffee club as a way to focus on people who were willing to take a very small leap across the financial chasm. Since January I have offered a private community space to anyone willing to pay $5 per month. Of the tens of thousands of people who read my work, I now have about 30 40 paid members of the Perpetual Beta Coffee Club (trademark nonexistent). As it grows — which is my hope — I will focus more of my energy there. So far we have a discussion forum and I host live web video chats monthly. These are recorded and available for 30 days. We try to ensure that what is discussed inside the coffee club stays there. I want to keep it as a trusted space. If the club grows, I intend to grow the services and offer a more robust community technology platform.

We are now six months in and there are people from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, UK, & USA. It’s a pretty eclectic group and while the main focus is workplace learning, we talk about whatever interests our members. The surveillance economy, and how to deal with it, was a recent topic.

I will keep on supporting our club and may some day turn it into my main professional focus. It’s much more fun to work with people who appreciate what you do and are willing to show it, not just use your work.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>conversation play-your-ukulele revenue to-emulate</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5bb68c33bb6e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:play-your-ukulele"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:revenue"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-emulate"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2017/02/the-nature-of-reality-a-dialogue-between-a-buddhist-scholar-alan-wallace-and-a-theoretical-physicist.html">
    <title>3quarksdaily: The Nature of Reality: A Dialogue Between a Buddhist Scholar (Alan Wallace) and a Theoretical Physicist (Sean Carroll)</title>
    <dc:date>2017-02-24T14:54:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2017/02/the-nature-of-reality-a-dialogue-between-a-buddhist-scholar-alan-wallace-and-a-theoretical-physicist.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[THE NATURE OF REALITY: A DIALOGUE BETWEEN A BUDDHIST SCHOLAR (ALAN WALLACE) AND A THEORETICAL PHYSICIST (SEAN CARROLL)

]]></description>
<dc:subject>philosophy philosophy-of-science conversation video</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a0f698b93822/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:video"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts">
    <title>The Network Structure of Jewish Texts | Science Blogs | WIRED</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-22T12:51:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.wired.com/2014/07/the-network-structure-of-jewish-texts</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is a particularly appropriate method when it comes to Jewish texts. Many of these texts not only cite each other, but comment upon them, a sort of citation on steroids. For example, there is the Mishnah, part of the Oral Law in Judaism. Each section of Mishnah is in turn commented upon by the Gemara, and together these two things make up the Talmud. And there are medieval rabbis who in turn comment on the Talmud, as well as each other. And so on and so forth. With each text of course referencing and annotating the Bible. Ultimately, classical Jewish literature is one that is steeped in annotation and reference. It is the quintessential network.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>network-theory citation conversation culture digital-humanities interesting work-in-progress</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d6286431e1c0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digital-humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:work-in-progress"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://crookedtimber.org/2013/02/11/27491/">
    <title>Seminar on The Priority of Democracy — Crooked Timber</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-17T13:42:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://crookedtimber.org/2013/02/11/27491/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Over the next several days, we’ll be running a seminar on Jack Knight and Jim Johnson’s recent book, The Priority of Democracy. The participants:

]]></description>
<dc:subject>pragmatism politics public-policy cultural-dynamics conversation criticism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7aab7e084ef3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://digress.it/about/">
    <title>About « Digress.it</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-16T15:34:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://digress.it/about/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Digress.it is a WordPress plugin that offers paragraph-level commenting in the margins of a text. Digress.it is geared toward in-depth discussions of longer documents: article, essay or even book-length.

Blogs aren’t bad for having conversations, but comments tend to get unwieldy, and can feel detached when the original post is long. To solve this, Digress.it lets you run blog-style comment threads — digressions, if you will — off of individual paragraphs. To do this efficiently, we’ve re-imagined the conventional post-discussion hierarchy of blogs, moving the comment area from beneath the post to beside it (floating to the right) — hearkening back to the age-old practice of scribbling in page margins. We see great possibilities for educators, literary groups, political or civic activists, legal scholars, and pretty much anyone who wants to do a communal reading and encourage discussion."]]></description>
<dc:subject>blogging social-media conversation publishing wordpress</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a51d3a4196af/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wordpress"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/05/the-conversation-the-startup-australian-news-site-wants-to-bring-academic-expertise-to-breaking-news/">
    <title>The Conversation, the startup Australian news site, wants to bring academic expertise to breaking news » Nieman Journalism Lab » Pushing to the Future of Journalism</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T11:41:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.niemanlab.org/2011/05/the-conversation-the-startup-australian-news-site-wants-to-bring-academic-expertise-to-breaking-news/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["First, “every author has to fill out a profile, so the reader knows who the person is and their education. And there is the additional requirement of a disclosure of any potential conflicts which might color their judgment.” Second, in response to the political question — after noting that my academics-are-liberal assertion might be a bit loaded — Jaspan replied that what The Conversation is ultimately doing is putting people in touch with “academics who are usually better informed than the general public because of their depth of knowledge and their sense of the complexity of the issue.”

Third, and most important, Jaspan sees The Conversation, true to its name, as leading to public debate. “One of the key things we want to do with a public-facing media channel is to make sure we have a range of views on something like the execution of Osama Bin Ladin, and that we have different interpretations of what happened and whether or not the means in which it was done were judicial.” The main goal, though: “We want to surprise our readers. We don’t want to give them the usual explanations, alternative insights, and viewpoints — and that will lead to lively conversation.”

Jaspan’s backers come from both the nonprofit and for-profit realms. The Conversation is backed by Ernst & Young, among other corporate supporters. And from academia, he has drawn on some of the top Australian research universities, in addition to Australia’s Department of Education. To find the academics, Jaspan and his staff did a “census” of academics based on their areas of expertise. Then, by word of mouth, they asked participating academics to recommend colleagues who would make good contributors to the site."]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism academia commentary deepening-the-news experiment conversation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4adb15679767/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commentary"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:deepening-the-news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/interesting_talk/">
    <title>The Valve - A Literary Organ | Interesting Talk</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-06T18:02:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thevalve.org/go/valve/article/interesting_talk/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["They have an interesting opening conversation kicked off by Craig confessing (at 1:07) that, in the early days, he thought Stephen had it all together when, in fact, though Fry may have been quite successful, but he was a wreck. And so on and so forth. In the second segment there’s a throwaway reference to Russell and Whitehead’s Principia Mathematica in a conversation about Twitter. Jeeze! Sounds like these are educated people.

Principia Mathematica!?#! Late night TV in America. Can it be long before hell freezes over?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>talk-shows American-cultural-assumptions-overturned?! conversation interview I-frankly-am-stunned Stephen-Fry</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cb8c697902d5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:talk-shows"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:American-cultural-assumptions-overturned?!"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:I-frankly-am-stunned"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Stephen-Fry"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/scienceenvironment/2306/bedside_manners:_the_broken_spirituality_of_contemporary_us_medical_practice/">
    <title>Bedside Manners: The Broken Spirituality of Contemporary US Medical Practice | Science &amp; Environment | ReligionDispatches</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-05T13:27:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/scienceenvironment/2306/bedside_manners:_the_broken_spirituality_of_contemporary_us_medical_practice/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Hospital-based chaplains and pastoral counselors come up against a fairly brutal form of scientism all the time. In many health care institutions, these people are barely tolerated. They are pointedly not invited to participate in rounds or in patient evaluation sessions. I recall how, as a first-year seminary student doing what is called “supervised ministry” at a New Haven mental health hospital, I was somewhat shocked to see how patients’ behavior was interpreted purely in terms of reactions to their medications, whereas I could see plainly that many of these same patients were responding to the presence or absence of human connection—visits and phone calls from loved ones either made or not made, friendships with other patients either formed or broken."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>healthcare social-norms cultural-assumptions medical-culture social-psychology conversation most-doctors-fail</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ae3a78800800/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:healthcare"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:medical-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:most-doctors-fail"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=559:conversation-hackers-trolls-argumentation&amp;catid=32:oliviers-blog&amp;Itemid=34">
    <title>Conversation Hackers</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-12T13:56:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cognitionandculture.net/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=559:conversation-hackers-trolls-argumentation&amp;catid=32:oliviers-blog&amp;Itemid=34</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Two important men are having a careful conversation on military training. What do you call the guy who, having no particular competence or interest in the matter at hand, jumps in the conversation, systematically contradicts everyone with contrived arguments, ridicules the two competent discussants, orients the conversation on a completely different topic, then leaves the audience baffled and walks away, laughing? That Troll is Socrates in Plato's Laches. True, Plato's Socrates seldom hops in uninvited, and most of his interlocutors do not consider him noxious. Indeed one wonders why the whole city grew so irritated that they voted to condemn him to death. But Plato, like all philosophers and sophists, had a stake in defending his colleagues. In other views of Socrates (like Aristophanes' caricature), he is unmistakably trollish. "
]]></description>
<dc:subject>trolls conversation community social-norms social-engineering social-psychology life-online hacking cognitive-dissonance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1525a7f347d6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trolls"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:life-online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hacking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cognitive-dissonance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-07/stopping-the-next-mcveigh/">
    <title>Stopping the Next McVeigh - Page 1 - The Daily Beast</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T15:30:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-11-07/stopping-the-next-mcveigh/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Experts on extremist groups say that the outcries of right-wing tea-partiers, death panellers, birthers, and the like are accompanied by increased activity all along the paranoid fringe—from radical border-patrol groups to skinheads to sovereign citizens. Two camps are particularly restive: militia enthusiasts and white supremacists; their members are seething because of the persistence of two wars and the election of a black (and Democratic) president with an ambitious agenda. The previous upsurge of antigovernment activity in the 1990s—of which McVeigh’s attack marked the apex—was set off in part by a recession and the election of a liberal president."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>secession Civil-War conversation cultural-norms American-cultural-assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:96d27bf1571d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:secession"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Civil-War"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:American-cultural-assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-long-tail-of-respect/2009/11/05">
    <title>P2P Foundation » Blog Archive » The Long Tail of Respect</title>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T12:37:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/the-long-tail-of-respect/2009/11/05</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Engagement that begins with the intention of affecting others but not being affected by them, such as beginning with “I know” is ultimately merely an attempt to introduce or perpetuate a hierarchical power structure.  By contrast, engagement that begins with the willingness to be affected by others is in accord with the horizontal and ethical environment of mutual respect that is characteristic of p2p culture."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration social-norms conversation p2p panarchy cultural-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a1799527c351/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:p2p"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:panarchy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970203550604574358643117407778.html#mod=todays_us_weekend_journal">
    <title>A Manifesto for Slow Communication - WSJ.com</title>
    <dc:date>2009-09-03T11:03:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052970203550604574358643117407778.html#mod=todays_us_weekend_journal</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We need context in order to live, and if the environment of electronic communication has stopped providing it, we shouldn't search online for a solution but turn back to the real world and slow down. To do this, we need to uncouple our idea of progress from speed, separate the idea of speed from effi ciency, pause and step back enough to realize that efficiency may be good for business and governments but does not always lead to mindfulness and sustainable, rewarding relationships. We are here for a short time on this planet, and reacting to demands on our time by simply speeding up has canceled out many of the benefits of the Internet, which is one of the most fabulous technological inventions ever conceived. We are connected, yes, but we were before, only by gossamer threads that worked more slowly. Slow communication will preserve these threads and our ability to sensibly choose to use faster modes when necessary…."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>manifesto cultural-norms slow-X community communication attention conversation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:da05ae67179b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:manifesto"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:slow-X"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.artofhosting.org/home/">
    <title>Art Of Hosting - Home</title>
    <dc:date>2009-04-06T13:06:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.artofhosting.org/home/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Art of Hosting is not a method, even though it uses state-of-the-art (post-)modern social technologies that make a lot of sense and help turn that sense into effective action - if that is what the participants wish.

Art of Hosting is also not a group dynamic process, even though it touches upon and at times celebrates the wonderful feeling of community that any group using authentic human interactions will experience.

Art of Hosting most of all is the expression of a way of being, a way of life, a way of being with others and situations as they unfold. Hosting reality as the host in Rumi's poem "The Guest House" does, welcoming each person, feeling, concept and situation as it wishes to appear. And more - not only welcoming but actively and appreciatively inquiring into whatever seems to be important to one...."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration community emergence conversation meeting planning leadership management-consulting open-space new-ageyness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:37b41bd69e9b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emergence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:meeting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management-consulting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:new-ageyness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.skelliewag.org/">
    <title>Skelliewag.org</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-07T13:18:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.skelliewag.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>conversation blogging advice personal-brand</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1a0b950258f5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:personal-brand"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2008/06/whats-your-blog.html">
    <title>Beth's Blog: How Nonprofits Can Use Social Media: What's your (blog) Conversation Strategy?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-07T13:17:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://beth.typepad.com/beths_blog/2008/06/whats-your-blog.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>conversation blogging marketing engagement community discussion social-norms social-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:49f38a7392dc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:marketing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discussion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/">
    <title>disambiguity - » Ambient Intimacy</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-28T14:07:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.disambiguity.com/ambient-intimacy/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>ambient awareness communication community conversation social-norms cultural-norms networks sharing social-software web2.0 twitter</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:52dae3408ef9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ambient"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:awareness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:twitter"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/">
    <title>Open Science, Open Seminars « UK Web Focus</title>
    <dc:date>2008-03-09T12:27:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ukwebfocus.wordpress.com/2008/02/28/open-science-open-seminars/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>openness collaboration science pedagogy conversation digitization distribution academia social-norms</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7e7e4501c70a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://2007.recentchangescamp.org/What_to_remember_for_future_events">
    <title>What to remember for future events - RCC 2007</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-02T23:38:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://2007.recentchangescamp.org/What_to_remember_for_future_events</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>open-space meeting notes comments community conversation social-norms cultural-norms collaboration planning</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a182fb5bf3d9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-space"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:meeting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:notes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:comments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conversation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>