<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bookhappy.easyjournal.com/entry.aspx?eid=3600534"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2007/04/chronicle-nails-one.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html">
    <title>PressThink: Audience Atomization Overcome: Why the Internet Weakens the Authority of the Press</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-21T14:06:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized-- connected "up" to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding. I will try to explain why.
It’s easily the most useful diagram I’ve found for understanding the practice of journalism in the United States, and the hidden politics of that practice. You can draw it by hand right now. Take a sheet of paper and make a big circle in the middle. In the center of that circle draw a smaller one to create a doughnut shape. Label the doughnut hole “sphere of consensus.” Call the middle region “sphere of legitimate debate,” and the outer region “sphere of deviance.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism media social-norms social-dynamics discourse politics communication criticism authority newspapers analysis consensus disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c1eb7ca143e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bookhappy.easyjournal.com/entry.aspx?eid=3600534">
    <title>The Cutthroat World of Book Scouting</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-23T12:03:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bookhappy.easyjournal.com/entry.aspx?eid=3600534</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[What's that old thing worth?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics books bookseller scarcity consensus markets pricing experiment antiquarian</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c4402f14fc2a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bookseller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scarcity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pricing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:antiquarian"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2007/04/chronicle-nails-one.html">
    <title>Confessions of a Community College Dean: The Chronicle Nails One</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-16T11:49:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2007/04/chronicle-nails-one.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Losing isn’t proof that your input was disregarded. It may well have been taken seriously. It just didn’t win." (A sentiment no tenured faculty I've ever met will ever get....)
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academia committees decision-making cultural-norms consensus management frustration</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:48598fc8e8df/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:committees"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decision-making"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:frustration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>