<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIISnE3GPJk"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10291"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://josephg.com/blog/crdts-are-the-future/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://mguzdial.itch.io/half-truth-histories"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://asciinema.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://khanlou.com/2019/07/continuous-integration/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.unemployednegativity.com/2018/12/its-competition-all-way-down-on.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://agileandchange.com/3-tools-from-sociocracy-to-use-right-away-plus-magic-phrases-535e908fd060?platform=hootsuite"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://antonhowes.weebly.com/uploads/2/1/0/8/21082490/spread_of_improvement_working_paper.pdf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jarche.com/2015/08/cooperation-for-the-network-era/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07910"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://aeon.co/essays/its-time-to-reboot-the-relationship-between-expertise-and-democracy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://math.williams.edu/small/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hapgood.us/2014/08/14/the-web-is-broken-and-we-should-fix-it/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/what-happens-when-humans-use-animals-to-make-art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.01298"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/can-coops-revolutionize-the-tech-industry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05211"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00715"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00237"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0913"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/10/28/009746"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-genius.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=4"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://github.com/pjotrp/bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.joaap.org/issue9/notanalternative.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.20.8273"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7146"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://www.writelatex.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cognition.happycog.com/article/times-they-are-a-changin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://criticmarkup.com/users-guide.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/git-tips-from-the-pros/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6843"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://emergentbydesign.com/2012/06/28/a-step-by-step-guide-to-tribal-leadership-part-1-the-five-stages-of-tribal-culture/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.shareable.net/blog/hacking-home-coliving-reinvents-communal-living-for-a-networked-generation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3180"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/artistic-distance/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://menachemmendel.net/blog/2012/02/27/artscroll-talmud-goes-digital/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hackeducation.com/2012/03/19/beyond-the-textbook/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://groupworksdeck.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.4955"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/11/16/free-ride-digital-parasites-robert-levine/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt/archives/2011/08/the_art_of_publ.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0404"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/plato.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ifyoulivedherebook.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bozosapiens.blogspot.com/2011/05/robert-owen-laboriousness.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.cultureworksphila.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/06/what-does-a-week-at-indy-hall-look-like/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://financialagile.com/reflections/7-finance/89-another-sacred-cow-to-be-killed"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.crowdflower.com/2011/05/designing-incentives-for-crowdsourcing-workers/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://asack.typepad.com/a_sack_of_seattle/2011/05/things-i-love-about-founders-co-op-and-our-makeshift-receptionist.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chatboxapp.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2011/05/embedding_collaboration_from_t.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/05/how-gaimans-q8in8q-is-exciting-the-sff-community?utm_source=Feedburner%3A+Frontpage+Partial+RSS+Feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Torcom%2FFrontpage_Partial+%28Tor.com+Frontpage+Partial+-+Blog+and+Stories%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://skilfulminds.com/2010/08/15/gossip-collaboration-and-performance-in-distributed-teams/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://skilfulminds.com/2009/08/27/empathy-and-collaboration-in-social-business-design/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://mashable.com/2011/05/13/open-source-students/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html?_r=2&amp;ref=homepage&amp;src=me&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://bettermeans.com/front/?page_id=306"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://allthingsthatrise.com/2010/05/02/the-out-crowd-why-crowdsourcing-creative-is-both-smart-and-good/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2672"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4131"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6374.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2010/01/reshaping-relationships-through-passion.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIISnE3GPJk">
    <title>We Have to Reimagine Our World | Architect Indy Johar | Louisiana Channel - YouTube</title>
    <dc:date>2024-05-18T00:16:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIISnE3GPJk</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>decentralization architecture design many-to-many-contracts rather-interesting via:? collaboration rethinking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:067a11626477/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decentralization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:many-to-many-contracts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:?"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rethinking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10291">
    <title>[2101.10291] The Shifting Sands of Motivation: Revisiting What Drives Contributors in Open Source</title>
    <dc:date>2022-03-13T10:59:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.10291</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Open Source Software (OSS) has changed drastically over the last decade, with OSS projects now producing a large ecosystem of popular products, involving industry participation, and providing professional career opportunities. But our field's understanding of what motivates people to contribute to OSS is still fundamentally grounded in studies from the early 2000s. With the changed landscape of OSS, it is very likely that motivations to join OSS have also evolved. Through a survey of 242 OSS contributors, we investigate shifts in motivation from three perspectives: (1) the impact of the new OSS landscape, (2) the impact of individuals' personal growth as they become part of OSS communities, and (3) the impact of differences in individuals' demographics. Our results show that some motivations related to social aspects and reputation increased in frequency and that some intrinsic and internalized motivations, such as learning and intellectual stimulation, are still highly relevant. We also found that contributing to OSS often transforms extrinsic motivations to intrinsic, and that while experienced contributors often shift toward altruism, novices often shift toward career, fun, kinship, and learning. OSS projects can leverage our results to revisit current strategies to attract and retain contributors, and researchers and tool builders can better support the design of new studies and tools to engage and support OSS development.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source community-formation project-management motivation cultural-norms online-life collaboration sociology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:47b4e9445023/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community-formation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:motivation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online-life"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://josephg.com/blog/crdts-are-the-future/">
    <title>I was wrong. CRDTs are the future</title>
    <dc:date>2021-06-20T14:48:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://josephg.com/blog/crdts-are-the-future/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Remember, the algorithm Wave used was invented in 1995. Thats a pretty long time ago. I don’t think I even had the internet at home back in 1995. Since then, researchers have been busy trying to make OT work better. The most promising work uses CRDTs (Conflict-Free Replicated data types). CRDTs approach the problem slightly differently to allow realtime editing without needing a central source of truth. Martin lays out how they work in his talk better than I can, so I’ll skip the details.

People have been asking me what I think of them for many years, and my answer was always something like this:

They’re neat and I’m glad people are working on them but:

They’re slow. Like, really slow. Eg Delta-CRDTs takes nearly 6 hours to process a real world editing session with a single user typing a 100KB academic paper. (Benchmarks - look for B4.)
Because of how CRDTs work, documents grow without bound. The current automerge master takes 83MB to represent that 100KB document on disk. Can you ever delete that data? Probably not. And that data can’t just sit on disk. It needs to be loaded into memory to handle edits. (Automerge currently grows to 1.1GB in memory for that.)
CRDTs are missing features that OT has had for years. For example, nobody has yet made a CRDT that supports /object move/ (move something from one part of a JSON tree to another). You need this for applications like Workflowy. OT handles this fine.
CRDTs are complicated and hard to reason about.
You probably have a centralized server / database anyway.
I made all those criticisms and dismissed CRDTs. But in doing so I stopped keeping track of the literature. And - surprise! CRDTs went and quietly got better. Martin’s talk (which is well worth a watch) addressed the main points:

Speed: Using modern CRDTs (Automerge / RGA or y.js / YATA), applying operations should be possible with just an log(n) lookup. (More on this below).
Size: Martin’s columnar encoding can store a text document with only about a 1.5x-2x size overhead compared to the contents themselves. Martin talks about this 54 minutes into his talk. The code to make this work in automerge hasn’t merged yet, but Yjs implemented Martin’s ideas. And in doing so, Yjs can store that same 100KB document in 160KB on disk, or 3MB in memory. Much better.
Features: There’s at least a theoretical way to add all the features using rewinding and replaying, though nobody’s implemented this stuff yet.
Complexity: I think a decent CRDT will be bigger than the equivalent OT implementation, but not by much. Martin managed to make a tiny, slow implementation of automerge in only about 100 lines of code.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration data-structures distributed-processing community rather-interesting to-understand consider:agents consider:proofreading</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:69a8c94c0b86/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-structures"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed-processing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:agents"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:proofreading"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://mguzdial.itch.io/half-truth-histories">
    <title>Half-Truth Histories by Matthew Guzdial</title>
    <dc:date>2020-03-18T10:59:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://mguzdial.itch.io/half-truth-histories</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This is a GM-less game for creating the contradictory histories and map of a game world. It is designed for play just before a tabletop RPG campaign to set up a world and the often contradictory things it’s people believe about it. 

In-fiction the game is a conversation around a fire between a number of travellers, somewhere in the game world, sometime before the game takes place. The exact details of when and where need not be decided until after the game is done, if ever.

Half-Truth Histories makes no assumption of setting. 

Mechanically, the game is a bit like the card games UNO or War, but played much more slowly and without any reflex requirement. The closest games to Half-Truth Histories are the Quiet Year, Microscope, and The Extraordinary Adventures of Baron Munchausen, which are direct inspirations. But where the Quiet Year creates the history of the fall of one settlement and it’s map, Half-Truth Histories focuses on the contradictory stories of a whole game world and it’s map.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>ttRPG roleplaying-games collaboration storytelling rather-interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8a4e35796e34/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ttRPG"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:roleplaying-games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:storytelling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://asciinema.org/">
    <title>asciinema - Record and share your terminal sessions, the right way</title>
    <dc:date>2020-02-12T12:17:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://asciinema.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[asciinema [as-kee-nuh-muh] is a free and open source solution for recording terminal sessions and sharing them on the web. Read about how it works.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration screencasting rather-interesting software open-source to-understand to-try</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0727d8e07cd4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:screencasting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-understand"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-try"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://khanlou.com/2019/07/continuous-integration/">
    <title>Khanlou | Continuous Integration</title>
    <dc:date>2019-08-18T11:54:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://khanlou.com/2019/07/continuous-integration/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Code that isn’t integrated into your team’s mainline branch should be considered a liability at best, and dead at worst. Your job is to get the small, workable units of code merged in as early as possible.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>continuous-integration software-development-is-not-programming collaboration rapid-feedback to-write-about academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5435d6dcf4af/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:continuous-integration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development-is-not-programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rapid-feedback"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.unemployednegativity.com/2018/12/its-competition-all-way-down-on.html">
    <title>Unemployed Negativity: Its Competition All the Way Down: On the Spontaneous Anthropology of Contemporary Capitalism</title>
    <dc:date>2018-12-24T16:26:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.unemployednegativity.com/2018/12/its-competition-all-way-down-on.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The cooperative dimension of our social life is constantly faced with its own disappearance. It is eclipsed by the ideologies that tell us that we live brutal lives of competition and self interest, and by the technologies that make it so. Social media has made friendship itself quantitative and competitive. However, it does not totally go away, and it cannot. As Peter Fleming has argued, it is precisely this incalculable sociality that is at the basis of contemporary work. Social relations not only sustain the workplace, as our attempts to assist and amuse each other do more for morale than any imposed "team building workshop," but also outside of it as well, networks of care from carpooling to grandparents babysitting kids make possible the world of isolated and competitive workers. Every squeeze, every reduction of wages or increase in working times, may be addressed to us as competitive individuals, compelling us to increase our competitive leverage, but it material affects us as parts of networks of relations that exceed it. Every cut to social services, every reduction in wages, is very often absorbed by increased pressure on relations of cooperation that are invisible to a society that tells itself it functions in and through cooperation. Cooperation functions as the concealed support and buttress for an ideology of competition.

It is not a matter of not only refusing to believe in competition, but to turn the networks of pollination into something other than support for our continued exploitation.  Viewed from the outside and fairly superficially, the "gilet jaunes" in France would seem to be an example of what can happen when social relations contest capital rather than simply absorb its costs. It is necessary to go from worker bees to a swarm.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>political-economy metaphors-on-the-run social-norms collaboration competition to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:158f0aa59d0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:political-economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:metaphors-on-the-run"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://agileandchange.com/3-tools-from-sociocracy-to-use-right-away-plus-magic-phrases-535e908fd060?platform=hootsuite">
    <title>3 tools from sociocracy to use right away (plus magic phrases!)</title>
    <dc:date>2018-11-18T13:53:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://agileandchange.com/3-tools-from-sociocracy-to-use-right-away-plus-magic-phrases-535e908fd060?platform=hootsuite</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Of course I myself am ego-driven and I have a ton of good ideas! But I also know that it only takes one person in the circle engaging in cross-talk and the good effects of rounds are lost. What do I do with all my brilliant ideas? I write them on a piece of paper. When it is my turn, I will often look at my piece of paper and realize that, after a few minutes of listening to others, about 90% of my ideas have either been named or, on second thought, they don’t seem all that great or urgent anymore. Humbled, I am often grateful for having been forced to weed through what I say. And when people pass on their turn saying “All I wanted to say has been said” I feel the urge to get up and hug them in gratitude for not putting the group through endless repetitions. Which also answers the last reservation I hear very often: aren’t rounds lenghty? Maybe. But both inconsiderate decisions, repetitive statements and emotional “clean-up” after disregard of team members takes a lot of time too. Your choice!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-dynamics social-norms collaboration organizational-behavior teams rather-interesting to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7ce1b006892d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:organizational-behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://antonhowes.weebly.com/uploads/2/1/0/8/21082490/spread_of_improvement_working_paper.pdf">
    <title>[PDF] The Spread of Improvement: Why Innovation Accelerated in Britain 1547-1851</title>
    <dc:date>2018-11-18T13:50:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://antonhowes.weebly.com/uploads/2/1/0/8/21082490/spread_of_improvement_working_paper.pdf</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In the three centuries after the reign of Henry VIII, the British Isles emerged from civil wars, invasion threats, and religious strife to become the world's technological leader. Why did innovation accelerate? I studied the people responsible, the innovators themselves, using a sample of 1,452 people in Britain who innovated between 1547 and 1851.

The paper charts the emergence and spread of an improving mentality, tracing its transmission from person to person and across the country. The mentality was not a technique, skill, or special understanding, but a frame of mind: innovators saw room for improvement where others saw none. The mentality could be received by anyone, and it could be applied to any field – anything, after all, could be better.

But what led to innovation’s acceleration was not just that the mentality spread: over the course of the eighteenth century innovators became increasingly committed to spreading the mentality further – they became innovation’s evangelists. By creating new institutions and adopting social norms conducive to openness and active sharing, innovators ensured the continued dissemination of innovation, giving rise to modern economic growth in Britain and abroad.]]></description>
<dc:subject>epidemiology-of-ideas symmathesy rather-interesting topical history-of-ideas collaboration the-mangle-in-practice sociotechnical-us</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2949c882f612/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:epidemiology-of-ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:symmathesy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:topical"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-of-ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociotechnical-us"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jarche.com/2015/08/cooperation-for-the-network-era/">
    <title>cooperation for the network era</title>
    <dc:date>2018-10-04T10:56:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jarche.com/2015/08/cooperation-for-the-network-era/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Organizations need to extend the notion of work beyond collaboration, beyond teams, and beyond the corporate fire wall. They need to make social networks, communities of practice, and narrative part of the work. It’s a big leap but we need to change the business conversation away from confident military terms (target market, strategic plan, marketing campaign) and instead talk in terms of complexity, wicked problems, and cooperation.

We are moving from a market economy to a network economy and the level of complexity is increasing with this hyper-connectedness. Managing in complex adaptive systems means influencing possibilities rather than striving for predictability (good or best practices). Cooperation in our work is needed so that we can continuously develop emergent practices demanded by this complexity. What worked yesterday won’t work today. No one has the definitive answer any more, but we can use the intelligence of our networks to make sense together and see how we can influence desired results. This is cooperation and this is the future, which is already here, albeit unevenly distributed.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>organizational-behavior collective-behavior collaboration cooperation thinking-about-being to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0551a1bae31a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:organizational-behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-behavior"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cooperation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:thinking-about-being"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/">
    <title>Performance and collaboration: creating new scientific ecosystems at CESTEMER | Ronin Institute</title>
    <dc:date>2018-03-05T14:57:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://ronininstitute.org/performance-and-collaboration-creating-new-scientific-ecosystems/1835/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The intense competition to demonstrate individual “ownership” of an idea often prevails in the academic world (coupled with an artificial scarcity that is perpetuated by the journal prestige system amongst other things) can sometimes lead to an atmosphere of distrust. Therefore the direct experience of the value of empathetic collaboration to produce both better results, as well as unexpected and serendipitous discoveries, through such workshops, will become increasingly invaluable as a means for cultural change in our institutions. This bottom-up approach, coupled with more top-down changes in publications and funding incentives, will, I believe, lead to more durable cultural change than either alone. Plus it’s also a much more fun way of doing science!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>science open-science collaboration conferences to-do next-time</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3fea8dd6c23b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conferences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:next-time"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07910">
    <title>[1712.07910] The advantages of interdisciplinarity in modern science</title>
    <dc:date>2018-01-28T14:43:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07910</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[As the increasing complexity of large-scale research requires the combined efforts of scientists with expertise in different fields, the advantages and costs of interdisciplinary scholarship have taken center stage in current debates on scientific production. Here we conduct a comparative assessment of the scientific success of specialized and interdisciplinary researchers in modern science. Drawing on comprehensive data sets on scientific production, we propose a two-pronged approach to interdisciplinarity. For each scientist, we distinguish between background interdisciplinarity, rooted in knowledge accumulated over time, and social interdisciplinarity, stemming from exposure to collaborators' knowledge. We find that, while abandoning specialization in favor of moderate degrees of background interdisciplinarity deteriorates performance, very interdisciplinary scientists outperform specialized ones, at all career stages. Moreover, successful scientists tend to intensify the heterogeneity of collaborators and to match the diversity of their network with the diversity of their background. Collaboration sustains performance by facilitating knowledge diffusion, acquisition and creation. Successful scientists tend to absorb a larger fraction of their collaborators' knowledge, and at a faster pace, than less successful ones. Collaboration also provides successful scientists with opportunities for the cross-fertilization of ideas and the synergistic creation of new knowledge. These results can inspire scientists to shape successful careers, research institutions to develop effective recruitment policies, and funding agencies to award grants of enhanced impact.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>big-science diversity system-of-professions interdisciplinarity collaboration sociology academic-culture a-way-of-being-thought-shallow-in-two-fields-at-once</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a2e9bbdb5c66/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:big-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:system-of-professions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interdisciplinarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:a-way-of-being-thought-shallow-in-two-fields-at-once"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://aeon.co/essays/its-time-to-reboot-the-relationship-between-expertise-and-democracy">
    <title>It's time to reboot the relationship between expertise and democracy | Aeon Essays</title>
    <dc:date>2017-06-11T10:57:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://aeon.co/essays/its-time-to-reboot-the-relationship-between-expertise-and-democracy</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Young Rebecca, however, did what a sensible person would: she started looking through databases of old newspapers. She found the signs, as the Daily Beast later reported, ‘collecting a handful of examples, then dozens, then more. She went to as many newspaper databases as she could. Then she thought, somebody had to have done this before, right?’ As it turned out, neither Jensen nor anyone else had apparently bothered to do this basic fact-checking. Miss Fried has now entered high school with a published piece in the Journal of Social History, and she is not alone in overturning the status quo.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>expertise academic-culture another-way collaboration social-networks collective-intelligence to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a4391695da72/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:another-way"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://math.williams.edu/small/">
    <title>SMALL | Mathematics &amp; Statistics</title>
    <dc:date>2017-05-25T19:42:52+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://math.williams.edu/small/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The SMALL Undergraduate Research Project is a nine-week residential summer program in which undergraduates investigate open research problems in mathematics. One of the largest programs of its kind in the country, SMALL is supported in part by a National Science Foundation grant for Research Experiences for Undergraduates and by the Science Center of Williams College. Around 500 students have participated in the project since its inception in 1988.

Students work in small groups directed by individual faculty members. Many participants have published papers and presented talks at research conferences based on work done in SMALL. Some have gone on to complete PhD’s in Mathematics. During off hours, students enjoy the many attractions of summer in the Berkshires: hiking, biking, plays, concerts, etc. Weekly lunches, teas, and casual sporting events bring SMALL students together with faculty and other students spending the summer doing research at Williams College.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-questions mathematics rather-interesting academic-culture collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4fa73d39db7f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-questions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hapgood.us/2014/08/14/the-web-is-broken-and-we-should-fix-it/">
    <title>The Web is Broken and We Should Fix It | Hapgood</title>
    <dc:date>2017-04-10T10:09:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hapgood.us/2014/08/14/the-web-is-broken-and-we-should-fix-it/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[There’s actually a pretty simple alternative to the current web. In federated wiki, when you find a page you like, you curate it to your own server (which may even be running on your laptop). That forms part of a named-content system, and if later that page disappears at the source, the system can find dozens of curated copies across the web. Your curation of a page guarantees the survival of the page. The named-content scheme guarantees it will be findable.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>web-design web-culture social-norms intellectual-property public-policy collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8d069166a171/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/what-happens-when-humans-use-animals-to-make-art">
    <title>This Is What Happens When Humans Use Animals to Make Art - Creators</title>
    <dc:date>2017-02-28T11:48:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://creators.vice.com/en_us/article/what-happens-when-humans-use-animals-to-make-art</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Each work in the exhibition is the result of an artistic "collaboration" between a human and an animal, ranging from honeybees and spiders to a sapsucker bird. Different than art that depicts or uses animals in some way—Damien Hirst's shark in formaldehyde or Jeff Koons' countless Balloon Dog sculptures—the works in Animal Intent literally incorporate interventions and creations made by animals as part of each work's material or process. 

]]></description>
<dc:subject>art via:twitter generative-art collaboration to-write-about</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:95ecef6645fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:twitter"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:generative-art"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.01298">
    <title>[1601.01298] Visibility Graphs, Dismantlability, and the Cops and Robbers Game</title>
    <dc:date>2016-04-11T11:45:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.01298</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We study versions of cop and robber pursuit-evasion games on the visibility graphs of polygons, and inside polygons with straight and curved sides. Each player has full information about the other player's location, players take turns, and the robber is captured when the cop arrives at the same point as the robber. In visibility graphs we show the cop can always win because visibility graphs are dismantlable, which is interesting as one of the few results relating visibility graphs to other known graph classes. We extend this to show that the cop wins games in which players move along straight line segments inside any polygon and, more generally, inside any simply connected planar region with a reasonable boundary. Essentially, our problem is a type of pursuit-evasion using the link metric rather than the Euclidean metric, and our result provides an interesting class of infinite cop-win graphs.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>computational-geometry planning agent-based games nudge-targets plane-geometry rather-interesting teams collaboration machine-learning</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:aaab91c42562/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plane-geometry"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/can-coops-revolutionize-the-tech-industry">
    <title>Can Coops Revolutionize the Tech Industry? by Gabrielle Anctil | Model View Culture</title>
    <dc:date>2016-03-21T10:57:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/can-coops-revolutionize-the-tech-industry</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Spoiler alert: I love coops.

I do more than just love them, in fact. I believe they can be something of a revolutionary tool for the greater good. Coops have democracy and horizontal decision making processes encased in their DNA. They generally have strong community values and believe in transparency. In a coop, technically, everybody has a voice. And while none of them are perfect, of course, the fact that democracy is so central to the making of a coop generally means that if somebody brings up an important issue – say, oppression – then it cannot be swept under the rug.

When it comes to the world of tech, where inclusivity is still a fight to be fought, I think worker coops can be a powerful weapon.

No wonder I work in one of them.

I started at Koumbit about a year ago, drawn to the values it embodied. But, as a full-time feminist, I was still suspicious of my new work environment: “If this place is so good for women,” I thought, “then why are there only 4 of us on a team of 12 people?”

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:adrianh collaboration co-op business-culture business-model disintermediation-in-action startup-culture-must-die</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b16fc786baf1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:adrianh"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:co-op"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:startup-culture-must-die"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05211">
    <title>[1505.05211] Principles of Dataset Versioning: Exploring the Recreation/Storage Tradeoff</title>
    <dc:date>2016-01-29T11:12:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1505.05211</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The relative ease of collaborative data science and analysis has led to a proliferation of many thousands or millions of versions of the same datasets in many scientific and commercial domains, acquired or constructed at various stages of data analysis across many users, and often over long periods of time. Managing, storing, and recreating these dataset versions is a non-trivial task. The fundamental challenge here is the storage−recreationtrade−off: the more storage we use, the faster it is to recreate or retrieve versions, while the less storage we use, the slower it is to recreate or retrieve versions. Despite the fundamental nature of this problem, there has been a surprisingly little amount of work on it. In this paper, we study this trade-off in a principled manner: we formulate six problems under various settings, trading off these quantities in various ways, demonstrate that most of the problems are intractable, and propose a suite of inexpensive heuristics drawing from techniques in delay-constrained scheduling, and spanning tree literature, to solve these problems. We have built a prototype version management system, that aims to serve as a foundation to our DATAHUB system for facilitating collaborative data science. We demonstrate, via extensive experiments, that our proposed heuristics provide efficient solutions in practical dataset versioning scenarios.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>data-analysis data-science collaboration computational-complexity rather-interesting models cultural-dynamics cultural-artifacts reproducibility</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b5b7f31e9a9d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-artifacts"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reproducibility"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00715">
    <title>[1501.00715] Mechanism Design for Team Formation</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-09T10:39:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1501.00715</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Team formation is a core problem in AI. Remarkably, little prior work has addressed the problem of mechanism design for team formation, accounting for the need to elicit agents' preferences over potential teammates. Coalition formation in the related hedonic games has received much attention, but only from the perspective of coalition stability, with little emphasis on the mechanism design objectives of true preference elicitation, social welfare, and equity. We present the first formal mechanism design framework for team formation, building on recent combinatorial matching market design literature. We exhibit four mechanisms for this problem, two novel, two simple extensions of known mechanisms from other domains. Two of these (one new, one known) have desirable theoretical properties. However, we use extensive experiments to show our second novel mechanism, despite having no theoretical guarantees, empirically achieves good incentive compatibility, welfare, and fairness.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>teams collaboration collective-intelligence artificial-intelligence performance-measure algorithms machine-learning system-of-professions unremarked:Terry-Soule to-critique Misrepresentations</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ab6072c6fa8d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:artificial-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:performance-measure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:system-of-professions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:unremarked:Terry-Soule"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Misrepresentations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00237">
    <title>[1503.00237] Task Allocation in Robotic Swarms: Explicit Communication Based Approaches</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-03T11:19:01+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1503.00237</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In this paper we study multi robot cooperative task allocation issue in a situation where a swarm of robots is deployed in a confi?ned unknown environment where the number of colored spots which represent tasks and the ratios of them are unknown. The robots should cover this spots as far as possible to do cleaning and sampling actions desirably. It means that they should discover the spots cooperatively and spread proportional to the spots area and avoid from remaining idle. We proposed 4 self-organized distributed methods which are called hybrid methods for coping with this scenario. In two diffe?rent experiments the performance of the methods is analyzed. We compared them with each other and investigated their scalability and robustness in term of single point of failure.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collective-intelligence robotics planning collaboration emergent-design nudge-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:eea0b70d1788/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:robotics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emergent-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0913">
    <title>[1407.0913] Voting Behavior, Coalitions and Government Strength through a Complex Network Analysis</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-14T11:44:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.0913</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We analyze the network of relations between parliament members according to their voting behavior. In particular, we examine the emergent community structure with respect to political coalitions and government alliances. We rely on tools developed in the Complex Network literature to explore the core of these communities and use their topological features to develop new metrics for party polarization, internal coalition cohesiveness and government strength. As a case study, we focus on the Chamber of Deputies of the Italian Parliament, for which we are able to characterize the heterogeneity of the ruling coalition as well as parties specific contributions to the stability of the government over time. We find sharp contrast in the political debate which surprisingly does not imply a relevant structure based on establised parties. We take a closer look to changes in the community structure after parties split up and their effect on the position of single deputies within communities. Finally, we introduce a way to track the stability of the government coalition over time that is able to discern the contribution of each member along with the impact of its possible defection. While our case study relies on the Italian parliament, whose relevance has come into the international spotlight in the present economic downturn, the methods developed here are entirely general and can therefore be applied to a multitude of other scenarios.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-networks politics government real-data sociology collaboration public-policy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c6d22645c4e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:real-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/">
    <title>gerrit - Gerrit Code Review - Google Project Hosting</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-14T11:15:09+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://code.google.com/p/gerrit/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Gerrit is a web based code review system, facilitating online code reviews for projects using the Git version control system.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:nelson collaboration programming code-review project-management git</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ff2be33ad142/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:nelson"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:code-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:git"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/10/28/009746">
    <title>Collective action and the collaborative brain | bioRxiv</title>
    <dc:date>2014-11-03T11:52:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/10/28/009746</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Humans are unique both in their cognitive abilities and in the extent of cooperation in large groups of unrelated individuals. How our species evolved high intelligence in spite of various costs of having a large brain is perplexing. Equally puzzling is how our ancestors managed to overcome the collective action problem and evolve strong innate preferences for cooperative behavior. Here I theoretically study the evolution of social-cognitive competen- cies as driven by selection emerging from the need to produce public goods in games against nature or in direct competition with other groups. I use collaborative ability in collective actions as a proxy for social-cognitive competencies. My results suggest that collaborative ability is more likely to evolve first by between-group conflicts and then later be utilized and improved in games against nature. If collaborative abilities remain low, the species is pre- dicted to become genetically dimorphic with a small proportion of individuals contributing to public goods and the rest free-riding. Evolution of collaborative ability creates conditions for the subsequent evolution of collaborative communication and cultural learning.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration ethology theoretical-biology cognition agent-based multiobjective-optimization rather-interesting nudge-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:22a7d1ac2ca9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ethology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:theoretical-biology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cognition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:multiobjective-optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-genius.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=4">
    <title>The End of ‘Genius’ - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-25T12:28:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/20/opinion/sunday/the-end-of-genius.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=4</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In fact, none of these men were alone in the garrets of their minds. Freud developed psychoanalysis in a heated exchange with the physician Wilhelm Fliess, whom Freud called the “godfather” of “The Interpretation of Dreams”; King co-led the civil rights movement with Ralph Abernathy (“My dearest friend and cellmate,” King said). Picasso had an overt collaboration with Georges Braque — they made Cubism together — and a rivalry with Henri Matisse so influential that we can fairly call it an adversarial collaboration. Even Einstein, for all his solitude, worked out the theory of relativity in conversation with the engineer Michele Besso, whom he praised as “the best sounding board in Europe.”

]]></description>
<dc:subject>cultural-assumptions genius worklife social-norms collaboration mythology social-psychology</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:89a30765b63c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:genius"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mythology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-psychology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://github.com/pjotrp/bioinformatics">
    <title>pjotrp/bioinformatics</title>
    <dc:date>2014-07-22T12:36:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://github.com/pjotrp/bioinformatics</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[At this point bioinformatics is thriving because of the sequencing bonanza. Arguably, bioinformatics is in a crisis because existing software engineering efforts are not really matching the requirements of big data. Not so long ago, programmers got by writing specialised (small) tools in Perl, Python, R or C. Today, bioinformatics software engineering has to deal with multi-core programming, IO bottlenecks, RAM constraints and demanding users. The overall challenge has become too large a job for the isolated student trying to write the next great all-inclusive software solution. We are increasingly depending on collaborative efforts involving researchers with a background in biology, statistics, software development and system administration. This is where the MANIFESTO kicks in - by encouraging researchers and students to come out of isolation and write small tools that can be bolted together with other tools.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration bioinformatics manifestos academic-culture system-of-professions philosophy-of-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:94c1e2298dae/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bioinformatics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:manifestos"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:system-of-professions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.joaap.org/issue9/notanalternative.htm">
    <title>Issue 9 - Counter Power As Common Power</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-29T20:45:07+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.joaap.org/issue9/notanalternative.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This need to organize actions in secret clusters runs counter to the logic of the open platform. In Occupy, however, this contradiction was never seriously addressed. As a result, throughout the duration of the movement, accusations have been fired at groups for organizing actions in the name of Occupy that were not agreed to by the General Assembly. In a sense, a mindset was operative in the movement that simultaneously encouraged people to act autonomously and condemned them when they succeeded for not having secured approval in advance.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration OWS social-norms social-dynamics social-engineering criticism interesting</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2d3bc1bc77e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:OWS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interesting"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.20.8273">
    <title>CiteSeerX — On Languages For Dynamic Resource Scheduling Problems</title>
    <dc:date>2014-05-06T10:00:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.20.8273</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[: The modeling of very complex problems requires the participation of people with diverse backgrounds. The combined e#orts of these people, properly coordinated, can contribute to the solution of complex problems, but only if we facilitate the process of communicating. In this paper, we highlight the importance of languages, illustrated by a discussion of the #languages" used by four core groups of people. We showhow the choice of language can either disguise similarities or hide important di#erences. Most signi#cantly,we illustrate how the language we speak can color our view of the problem, leading, in some cases, to poor representations of a problem. #The elevator lift is being #xed for the next day. During that time we regret that you will be unbearable." - Sign in a Bucharest business. 1.1
]]></description>
<dc:subject>modeling language the-mangle-in-practice collaboration interesting via:?</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4385583e2555/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7146">
    <title>[1305.7146] &quot;You Know Because I Know&quot;: a Multidimensional Network Approach to Human Resources Problem</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-17T12:34:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1305.7146</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Finding talents, often among the people already hired, is an endemic challenge for organizations. The social networking revolution, with online tools like Linkedin, made possible to make explicit and accessible what we perceived, but not used, for thousands of years: the exact position and ranking of a person in a network of professional and personal connections. To search and mine where and how an employee is positioned on a global skill network will enable organizations to find unpredictable sources of knowledge, innovation and know-how. This data richness and hidden knowledge demands for a multidimensional and multiskill approach to the network ranking problem. Multidimensional networks are networks with multiple kinds of relations. To the best of our knowledge, no network-based ranking algorithm is able to handle multidimensional networks and multiple rankings over multiple attributes at the same time. In this paper we propose such an algorithm, whose aim is to address the node multi-ranking problem in multidimensional networks. We test our algorithm over several real world networks, extracted from DBLP and the Enron email corpus, and we show its usefulness in providing less trivial and more flexible rankings than the current state of the art algorithms.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-networks collective-intelligence collaboration social-engineering they-had-to-call-it-UBIK</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2de98e6ffcc4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-intelligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:they-had-to-call-it-UBIK"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/">
    <title>Fuzzy anchoring | Hypothes.is</title>
    <dc:date>2013-06-05T14:26:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://hypothes.is/blog/fuzzy-anchoring/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A large part of the unique potential of annotation comes from its ability to point inside media to specific places. Because of this, we must be able to reliably reference these specific locations in web resources, beginning with text. Hypertext links generally point to the top of documents and other web-connected media, which is not sufficient for our purposes. Document anchors exist, but these usually are established at fixed places by the author of the original document, and because of this, they are not useful for others in pointing to arbitrary locations in documents they do not have write access to.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>hypothes.is annotation collaboration web2.0 scholarly-communication network-weaving</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:de73831e2f0c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hypothes.is"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:annotation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarly-communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-weaving"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://www.writelatex.com/">
    <title>writeLaTeX: Online Collaborative LaTeX Editor with Integrated Rapid Preview</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-30T22:20:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://www.writelatex.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Online collaborative LaTeX editor with integrated rapid preview.]]></description>
<dc:subject>LaTeX collaboration online writing editors impressive</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:90ca47a45003/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:LaTeX"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:editors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:impressive"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://cognition.happycog.com/article/times-they-are-a-changin">
    <title>Times, They Are A-changin’ - Cognition: The blog of web design &amp; development firm Happy Cog</title>
    <dc:date>2013-03-10T11:36:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://cognition.happycog.com/article/times-they-are-a-changin</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Where does this leave the designer if there is no specific design phase? From what I can tell, everywhere. The three people working on the aforementioned project are all designers. They each have their specialties (user experience design, front-end development, graphic design), but they are all on our design team and all have the title of designer.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:blturner graphic-design agile collaboration emergent-design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cda52d80a068/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:blturner"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:graphic-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agile"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emergent-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://criticmarkup.com/users-guide.php">
    <title>CriticMarkup</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-17T13:17:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://criticmarkup.com/users-guide.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[CriticMarkup was designed to make plain text copyediting markup easy to write and easy to read. What follows is a short overview of the CriticMarkup syntax.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>markdown editing markup-languages collaboration beautiful but-not-quite-done</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5d48a40002f7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:markdown"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:editing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:markup-languages"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:beautiful"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:but-not-quite-done"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/git-tips-from-the-pros/">
    <title>Git Tips From the Pros | Nettuts+</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-17T13:09:37+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://net.tutsplus.com/tutorials/tools-and-tips/git-tips-from-the-pros/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[In this article, we're not going to review the basics of source control management, regardless of which one you use. Let's just assume that you already know how to get around. What we are going to cover is how the pros use git. We'll take a look at some of the advanced features and workflows that you might not already be familiar with. Hopefully, you’ll walk away with your mouth agape at the sheer possibilities that git provides!
]]></description>
<dc:subject>git tutorial advice project-management software-development collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:f9c694fd1583/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:git"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tutorial"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6843">
    <title>[1111.6843] Understanding the Social Cascading of Geekspeak and the Upshots for Social Cognitive Systems</title>
    <dc:date>2012-08-04T12:39:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.6843</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Barring swarm robotics, a substantial share of current machine-human and machine-machine learning and interaction mechanisms are being developed and fed by results of agent-based computer simulations, game-theoretic models, or robotic experiments based on a dyadic communication pattern. Yet, in real life, humans no less frequently communicate in groups, and gain knowledge and take decisions basing on information cumulatively gleaned from more than one single source. These properties should be taken into consideration in the design of autonomous artificial cognitive systems construed to interact with learn from more than one contact or 'neighbour'. To this end, significant practical import can be gleaned from research applying strict science methodology to human and social phenomena, e.g. to discovery of realistic creativity potential spans, or the 'exposure thresholds' after which new information could be accepted by a cognitive agent. The results will be presented of a project analysing the social propagation of neologisms in a microblogging service. From local, low-level interactions and information flows between agents inventing and imitating discrete lexemes we aim to describe the processes of the emergence of more global systemic order and dynamics, using the latest methods of complexity science. Whether in order to mimic them, or to 'enhance' them, parameters gleaned from complexity science approaches to humans' social and humanistic behaviour should subsequently be incorporated as points of reference in the field of robotics and human-machine interaction."]]></description>
<dc:subject>agent-based collective-inteligence collaboration language nudge-targets tagging social-networks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ba564ad12ae5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-inteligence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:language"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tagging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/">
    <title>The future of scientific publishing: Open post-publication peer review « The future of scientific publishing</title>
    <dc:date>2012-07-25T18:42:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://futureofscipub.wordpress.com/2009/11/12/open-post-publication-peer-review/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Post-publication: Reviews are submitted after publication, because the paper needs to be publicly accessible in order for any scientist to be able to review it. Post-publication reviews can add evaluative information to papers published in the current system (which have already been secretly reviewed before publication). For example, a highly controversial paper appearing in Science may motivate a number of supportive and critical post-publication reviews. The overall evaluation from these public reviews will affect the attention given to the paper by potential readers. The actual text of the reviews may help readers understand and judge the details of the paper."]]></description>
<dc:subject>peer-review open-science collaboration publishing to-do coscience</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d89e3bd456d0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-do"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coscience"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://emergentbydesign.com/2012/06/28/a-step-by-step-guide-to-tribal-leadership-part-1-the-five-stages-of-tribal-culture/">
    <title>A Step-by-Step Guide to Tribal Leadership: Part 1: The Five Stages of Tribal Culture « emergent by design</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-29T12:57:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://emergentbydesign.com/2012/06/28/a-step-by-step-guide-to-tribal-leadership-part-1-the-five-stages-of-tribal-culture/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Tribal Leaders are the people who focus their efforts on upgrading the tribal culture. (upgrading the words we use to describe our reality and the behaviors we practice that shape the direction of our lives)

They set the standard of performance in their industries, from productivity and profitability to employee retention, and attract talent. Most of all, they help bring groups to unity by recognizing their ‘tribalness’ – getting people to talk about the things they really care about, coming together around these common causes, and forming missions to make something great happen, and to live in greatness.

The goal of Tribal Leadership is to learn how to get people ‘unstuck’ – from unhelpful language and behaviors, so we can level up and transition into higher-performance, less stressful, and more fun states of Being."]]></description>
<dc:subject>i-hate-the-word-tribes collaboration leadership cultural-dynamics advice</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:919ec4ecbfc6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:i-hate-the-word-tribes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:leadership"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university">
    <title>The Pirate University | Pirate university</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-22T11:27:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pirateuniversity.org/content/pirate-university</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Pirate University is an on-line bulletin board on which students post requests for academic publications. You can compare it to an academic wish list. Others, who know where to find these publications, reply and if possible, provide links to the resources searched. The Pirate University is not providing, storing or sharing copyrighted material.

An important question is if the uploading of articles, publications is legal. If you are the copyright holder of the article requested, there should be no problem. Also in certain cases, if you or your institute have acquired the rights of the publication, or if it is free of rights, there shouldn't be a problem. It is probably best to consult with your librarian to see which kind of publication is okay to share on the Internet."]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture publishing collaboration crowdsourcing librarians open-access scholarship</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:982f86355aff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:librarians"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.shareable.net/blog/hacking-home-coliving-reinvents-communal-living-for-a-networked-generation">
    <title>Shareable: Hacking Home: Coliving Reinvents the Commune for a Networked Age</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-19T11:38:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.shareable.net/blog/hacking-home-coliving-reinvents-communal-living-for-a-networked-generation</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['It was more than just a luxury home full of brilliant young minds. Dubbed “an intentional community”, The Rainbow Mansion was an experiment in a new type of cohabitation. The house began hosting hackathons and salons in its library, inviting Silicon Valley’s best and brightest to participate. “Right away it set itself in motion,” Schingler says. “It had this sort of accidental mystique about it.”']]></description>
<dc:subject>cohousing collaboration nerd-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6840fb1cfa83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cohousing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nerd-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3180">
    <title>[1205.3180] Community-Quality-Based Player Ranking in Collaborative Games with no Explicit Objectives</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-08T15:03:57+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.3180</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["However, when the game has no clear objectives, no met- ric exists to measure player contribution quality. Indeed, each player may have a different personal motivation to achieve dif- ferent self-imposed goals [4], and player actions can be con- sidered fair or disruptive towards the community depending on whether they respect or damage other player contributions. In these cases, there is a very abstract and subjective shared implicit objective that could be described as building a fair and not disruptive player community. It should be noted that fair players benefit from their behavior, as it is more likely that other players act fair towards them. Furthermore, a com- munity of disruptive players seems to repel fair players and the community quality has an intuitive tendency to gradually drop off. Contrarily, a community of fair players lures new fair players, which lead, in turn, to an increase of the commu- nity quality."]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-dynamics game-theory collaboration performance-measure teams ranking-schemes agile-management to-explore</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:26f49f03be25/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:game-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:performance-measure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ranking-schemes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agile-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-explore"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.alistapart.com/articles/artistic-distance/">
    <title>A List Apart: Articles: Artistic Distance</title>
    <dc:date>2012-04-10T11:59:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.alistapart.com/articles/artistic-distance/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["While I’m sure that someone will disagree, these sites have proven that very few “professionals” have the ability or courage to provide a well-constructed analysis of someone else’s work (whether or not the evaluation was solicited). My opinion has nothing at all to do with either website, but rather with industry professionals’ inability to challenge, or fear of challenging, the status quo. Far too often, honesty is met with ridicule, shame, or outright rage from people hiding behind electronic media. As a community, if our goal is to continue raising the bar for design, we need to get to a place where objective discussion is welcomed, not scorned or drowned in obsequiousness. I would love to see discussion of basic design move past the superficial trendiness of emerging web technologies."]]></description>
<dc:subject>critique collaboration advice graphic-design not-just</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:485f0fc7881a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:critique"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:graphic-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-just"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://menachemmendel.net/blog/2012/02/27/artscroll-talmud-goes-digital/">
    <title>Artscroll Talmud Goes Digital-Updated « Menachem Mendel</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-23T10:45:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://menachemmendel.net/blog/2012/02/27/artscroll-talmud-goes-digital/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>digitization user-interface iOS coordination collaboration bookphile</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b364531534b0/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-interface"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:iOS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coordination"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bookphile"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hackeducation.com/2012/03/19/beyond-the-textbook/">
    <title>Beyond the Textbook</title>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T11:09:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hackeducation.com/2012/03/19/beyond-the-textbook/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['Even if you have the most up-to-date edition of the very latest textbook, I think it's recognize that the textbook -- as an object, as instructional practice -- is still a relic. It is a relic of a time when information was scarce. It's a relic of the way in which we manufactured and scaled the industrial model of education -- a teacher at the front of the classroom, assigning the lessons and readings from an authoritative text. One that was bound by print. One that was distributed state and even nation-wide. One that was uniform. Somewhere along the way, "textbook" became "curriculum" -- and under today's testing regime, that all became wrapped up in "assessment."']]></description>
<dc:subject>academia academic-culture publishing textbooks pedagogy collaboration adhocism pragmatism</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b5b0eddd9850/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:textbooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:adhocism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://groupworksdeck.org/">
    <title>Welcome to the Group Pattern Language Project | Group Works</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T13:42:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://groupworksdeck.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This deck of 91 full-colour cards names what skilled facilitators and other participants do to make things work.  The content is more specific than values and less specific than tips and techniques, cutting across existing methodologies with a designer's eye to capture the patterns that repeat.  The deck can be used to plan sesssions, reflect on and debrief them, provide guidance, and share responsibility for making the process go well.  It has the potential to provide a common reference point for practitioners, and serve as a framework and learning tool for those studying the field. "]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:bkerr collaboration design-patterns tools social-dynamics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:387215327711/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:bkerr"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design-patterns"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tools"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.4955">
    <title>[1201.4955] Coordination, Differentiation and Fairness in a population of cooperating agents</title>
    <dc:date>2012-01-27T13:32:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.4955</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In a recent paper, we analyzed the self-assembly of a complex cooperation network. The network was shown to approach a state, where every agent invests the same amount of resources. Nevertheless, highly-connected agents arise that extract extra-ordinarily high payoffs while contributing comparably little to any of their cooperations. Here, we investigate a variant of the model, in which highly-connected agents have access to additional resources. We study analytically and numerically whether these resources are invested in existing collaborations, leading to a fairer load distribution, or in establishing new collaborations, leading to an even less fair distribution of loads and payoffs."]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration social-capital agent-based network-theory complexology nudge-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3131ca995f83/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-capital"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/11/16/free-ride-digital-parasites-robert-levine/">
    <title>Free Ride: Digital Parasites and the Fight for the Business of Culture | Brain Pickings</title>
    <dc:date>2011-11-28T13:10:32+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2011/11/16/free-ride-digital-parasites-robert-levine/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["For my part, I started Brain Pickings more than six years ago as what’s commonly referred to as a “passion project” (though I don’t like the fleeting noncommittal relationship this phrasing suggests) and didn’t have a business model — but I did have a crystal-clear editorial model, which remains the same today: get people interested in meaningful cross-disciplinary things they didn’t yet know they were interested in, and in the process empower their networked knowledge and combinatorial creativity; break out of the filter bubble, if you will, though conceived long before we had the very vocabulary to articulate it. So when an aggregator like the Huffington Post, a business-model wolf wearing an editorial-authenticity sheep’s skin, takes my (ad-free) content and regurgitates it on its (ad-plastered) site, it lives up to the term “parasite” at the heart of Levine’s argument, derived from the Greek parasitos and used to describe “someone who ate at someone else’s table without providing anything in return.”"]]></description>
<dc:subject>publishing disintermediation reintermediation intellectual-property creativity collaboration network-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b8606d77c60c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reintermediation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt/archives/2011/08/the_art_of_publ.php">
    <title>collision detection: The art of public thinking</title>
    <dc:date>2011-09-02T11:29:54+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.collisiondetection.net/mt/archives/2011/08/the_art_of_publ.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This year, I’ve had another big load on my time: I’m writing my first book! Thus far it’s called Outsmart: The Future of Thought in the Age of Machines — a title possessed of such purple, sci-fi bombast that even though I wrote it myself, I still crack up every time I say it out loud. As you might imagine, coming from me, the book is a generally optimistic assessment of how digital tools are generating new ways for us to learn things, muse over them, and act on them. But the point is that it’s another time hog: Researching and writing a book has required such nose-to-the-grindstone work — to say nothing of nose-to-the-grindstone procrastination — that it has crowded out whatever time I might have had for blogging. Authors frequently describe the process of book-writing as similar to giving birth to a child, a metaphor I always found faintly icky; but, hey, maybe they were right. I’ve got three kids now, and no blog.

Yet as I’ve worked away on the book, I’ve increasingly begun to feel intellectually claustrophic. It’s hard to describe, but it’s like a cabin fever of the mind. The symptoms: I’ll get obsessed with a particular line of research, chewing away at it for days or weeks, only to realize it’s a) kind of half-baked or b) super interesting but not at all useful to my work. Or I’ll read a fascinating white paper, write a bunch of notes on it, but never crystallize a solid analysis.

I now think the problem is I’m not doing enough thinking in public."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:tsuomela blogging social-dynamics collaboration release-early-and-often essayism storytelling-is-a-social-process</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cf176886b55b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:tsuomela"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:blogging"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:release-early-and-often"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:essayism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:storytelling-is-a-social-process"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0404">
    <title>[1108.0404] Exploiting Agent and Type Independence in Collaborative Graphical Bayesian Games</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-25T12:29:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.0404</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Efficient collaborative decision making is an important challenge for multiagent systems. Finding optimal joint actions is especially challenging when each agent has only imperfect information about the state of its environment. Such problems can be modeled as collaborative Bayesian games in which each agent receives private information in the form of its type. However, representing and solving such games requires space and computation time exponential in the number of agents. This article introduces collaborative graphical Bayesian games (CGBGs), which facilitate more efficient collaborative decision making by decomposing the global payoff function as the sum of local payoff functions that depend on only a few agents. We propose a framework for the efficient solution of CGBGs based on the insight that they posses two different types of independence, which we call agent independence and type independence. In particular, we present a factor graph representation that captures both forms of independence and thus enables efficient solutions. In addition, we show how this representation can provide leverage in sequential tasks by using it to construct a novel method for decentralized partially observable Markov decision processes. Experimental results in both random and benchmark tasks demonstrate the improved scalability of our methods compared to several existing alternatives."]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration agent-based complex-systems emergent-design nudge-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d9155832ea5b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complex-systems"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emergent-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/plato.htm">
    <title>Plato, from The Phaedrus</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-03T12:14:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.units.muohio.edu/technologyandhumanities/plato.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…I cannot help feeling, Phaedrus, that writing is unfortunately like painting; for the creations of the painter have the attitude of life, and yet if you ask them a question they preserve a solemn silence. And the same may be said of speeches. You would imagine that they had intelligence, but if you want to know anything and put a question to one of them, the speaker always gives one unvarying answer.…"]]></description>
<dc:subject>Socrates dialog collaboration history foundationalism-depends-on-fact-checking</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:b005beb73f44/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Socrates"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:dialog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:foundationalism-depends-on-fact-checking"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ifyoulivedherebook.com/">
    <title>If You Lived Here</title>
    <dc:date>2011-07-02T12:52:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ifyoulivedherebook.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["How can you help? We're looking for readers' all-time favorite secondary worlds, from Middle Earth to Ring World, from Dune to Lankhmar and beyond...

We're taking nominations now. Just fill out the form below and submit it. That simple. If you feel like waxing poetic about your favorite second world, we might ask you if we can use what you write when it's time to go to press. Regardless, we'll keep you updated about which worlds get picked, and about the book as it gets closer to publication."]]></description>
<dc:subject>science-fiction collaboration writing worldbuilding history</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:fe23f4b7675e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science-fiction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worldbuilding"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bozosapiens.blogspot.com/2011/05/robert-owen-laboriousness.html">
    <title>Bozo Sapiens: Robert Owen: Laboriousness</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-10T14:25:50+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bozosapiens.blogspot.com/2011/05/robert-owen-laboriousness.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Owen had neglected to notice that expectations also change through circumstance. As our communal conditions advance, we all tend to want to become the prophet, not merely the congregation. Once the problem of survival is solved, it’s no longer enough not to be starving or abused or overworked – we want personal satisfaction and self-direction. So, yes: some of the great names in business – the Lowell mills, Hershey’s, Cadbury’s, Lever Brothers, Google – applied dilute Owenism to great effect, but success makes employees become more individualist and ask for more of their reward in cash, while hard times make shareholders less generous, pointing out that plenty of people would take the job without the crêche, lecture series, or company brass band. Shifting expectation drives the carousel for another turn; we remain ambivalent about work, this thing we do through most of our waking lives, because we still don’t know what it is for."]]></description>
<dc:subject>institutional-design collaboration workantile-exchange diversity plan-for-change</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:17afd9031720/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:institutional-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile-exchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:diversity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:plan-for-change"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.cultureworksphila.org/">
    <title>CultureWorks - Greater Philadelphia</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-05T12:28:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.cultureworksphila.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Cultural CoWorking: CultureWorks is currently developing Philadelphia's first coworking space specifically for the culture community in Center City. This space will provide networking, peer-to-peer support, technology, and other resources to individual creative workers, start-ups, and small organizations."]]></description>
<dc:subject>coworking collaboration workantile-exchange</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7e870edfc4e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile-exchange"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/06/what-does-a-week-at-indy-hall-look-like/">
    <title>What does a week at Indy Hall look like? | dangerouslyawesome</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-05T11:52:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://dangerouslyawesome.com/2011/06/what-does-a-week-at-indy-hall-look-like/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the course of one week I spoke at length with Kelani about new media performance art happening in North Philly, had a discussion in Swahili about coworking spaces in East Africa, and met the girlfriend of my friend Elijah Dornstreich. It’s ridiculously clear that there is tremendous power in simply being in one space, coworking together–so thank you for being the flagship for this movement here in Philly."]]></description>
<dc:subject>coworking independence worklife collaboration Indy-Hall workantile-exchange</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:3f31c4aa3df8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:independence"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Indy-Hall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile-exchange"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://financialagile.com/reflections/7-finance/89-another-sacred-cow-to-be-killed">
    <title>Another Sacred Cow To Be Killed: The Agile Retro</title>
    <dc:date>2011-06-01T11:17:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://financialagile.com/reflections/7-finance/89-another-sacred-cow-to-be-killed</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The story of Goat Island has parallels for us engineers.  Because we cannot predict results, we know that patience, hope and courage are functions of the design process.  Every so often, we have to remind ourselves of that.  We also know that patience is a function of a good retrospective.  Just as it took a certain amount of time for the snappers to grow large enough to take on the urchins, I think there is a certain – and measurable – amount of time for participants in a retrospective to open up and start moving beyond the superficial.  That amount of time is more than two hours."]]></description>
<dc:subject>learning-by-doing retrospectives agile-practices collaboration</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0c3da1b80cc4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-by-doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:retrospectives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agile-practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.crowdflower.com/2011/05/designing-incentives-for-crowdsourcing-workers/">
    <title>Designing Incentives for Crowdsourcing Workers | The CrowdFlower Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-30T11:23:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.crowdflower.com/2011/05/designing-incentives-for-crowdsourcing-workers/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Why do BTS and punishing workers for disagreement succeed in improving performance significantly where so many of the other incentive schemes failed? The answer hinges on the fact that both conditions tied workers’ payoffs to their ability to think about their peers’ likely responses. (We elaborate on the argument in more detail in the paper.)"]]></description>
<dc:subject>crowdsourcing collaboration collective-attention sociology economics via:Cory-Doctorow</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d2c141007b9f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective-attention"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:Cory-Doctorow"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://asack.typepad.com/a_sack_of_seattle/2011/05/things-i-love-about-founders-co-op-and-our-makeshift-receptionist.html">
    <title>Things I love about Founder's Co-op and Our Makeshift Receptionist - A Sack of Seattle</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-26T13:38:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://asack.typepad.com/a_sack_of_seattle/2011/05/things-i-love-about-founders-co-op-and-our-makeshift-receptionist.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["One interesting phenomenon is that some of the best seats in the house (near the windows, plenty of natural light, good access to the bathroom and kitchen) are avoided like the plague because they're too near the front entrance. Nobody wants to be mistaken for the receptionist. (Which we don't have.)  With 22 companies, 5 conference rooms, and a speakeasy throughout our 2 floors, guests need to be pointed in the right direction. The problem is that on busy days that could easily mean 15+ interruptions...not ideal for productivity."]]></description>
<dc:subject>coworking collaboration community workantile-exchange</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6f7e4c10ed6f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile-exchange"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://chatboxapp.com/">
    <title>Chatbox - Project collaboration inside Dropbox</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-26T11:59:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://chatboxapp.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Chatbox makes it easy to discuss or comment on files shared over Dropbox. Install it, right click on any files / folders inside Dropbox, and start conversations with people you shared the Dropbox folder with."]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration MacOS DropBox file-sharing</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:96e68613015f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:MacOS"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:DropBox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:file-sharing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2011/05/embedding_collaboration_from_t.html">
    <title>Embedding Collaboration from the Start - Jimmy Guterman - Our Editors - Harvard Business Review</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-20T11:54:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.hbr.org/hbr/hbreditors/2011/05/embedding_collaboration_from_t.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["At Nokia, informal mentoring begins as soon as someone steps into a new job. Typically, within a few days, the employee's manager will sit down and list all the people in the organization, no matter in what location, it would be useful for the employee to meet. This is a deeply ingrained cultural norm, which probably originated when Nokia was a smaller and simpler organization. The manager sits with the newcomer, just as her manager sat with her when she joined, and reviews what topics the newcomer should discuss with each person on the list and why establishing a relationship with him or her is important. It is then standard for the newcomer to actively set up meetings with the people on the list, even when it means traveling to other locations. The gift of time — in the form of hours spent on coaching and building networks — is seen as crucial to the collaborative culture at Nokia."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration management Workantile-ideas social-norms social-networks organizational-design</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9becfe4bddef/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Workantile-ideas"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:organizational-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/05/how-gaimans-q8in8q-is-exciting-the-sff-community?utm_source=Feedburner%3A+Frontpage+Partial+RSS+Feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Torcom%2FFrontpage_Partial+%28Tor.com+Frontpage+Partial+-+Blog+and+Stories%29">
    <title>How Gaiman&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;8in8&amp;rdquo; is Exciting SFF Fans | tor.com | Science fiction and fantasy | Blog posts</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-15T12:57:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tor.com/blogs/2011/05/how-gaimans-q8in8q-is-exciting-the-sff-community?utm_source=Feedburner%3A+Frontpage+Partial+RSS+Feed&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Torcom%2FFrontpage_Partial+%28Tor.com+Frontpage+Partial+-+Blog+and+Stories%29</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The group ended up recording a 6 song album, “Nighty Night,” in the space of 12 hours. You can listen to the full record streaming on Amanda Palmer’s site.

The Creative Commons-released material and somewhat egalitarian nature of the project has led to the online SFF and rock communities picking up the music and using it to craft their own original works. Below the cut, we list the coolest videos that have grown out of the project so far!

]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration creative-commons sustainability creativity mashup video skiffy</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:271e05951b8f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creative-commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:creativity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mashup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:skiffy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://skilfulminds.com/2010/08/15/gossip-collaboration-and-performance-in-distributed-teams/">
    <title>Gossip, Collaboration, and Performance in Distributed Teams « Skilful Minds</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-15T12:39:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://skilfulminds.com/2010/08/15/gossip-collaboration-and-performance-in-distributed-teams/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Those corporations that successfully implement these techniques will be torn apart as their traditional hierarchies and silos dissolve into right-sized communities; those that fail will be nibbled to death by community-based "competitors" who ignore those hierarchies. Either way, it's full of win.]]></description>
<dc:subject>disintermediation-in-action corporations sociology collaboration management anarchy-in-the-boardroom</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a24c29f2662e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anarchy-in-the-boardroom"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://skilfulminds.com/2009/08/27/empathy-and-collaboration-in-social-business-design/">
    <title>Empathy and Collaboration in Social Business Design « Skilful Minds</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-15T12:36:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://skilfulminds.com/2009/08/27/empathy-and-collaboration-in-social-business-design/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Collaboration means getting to know that other employees possess expertise on this or that topic, but also developing comfort with one another by sharing significant symbols relating to self, family, friends, and social activities, thereby understanding one another as people.]]></description>
<dc:subject>workantile-exchange collaboration community sociology membership</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:de18ff30eee9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:workantile-exchange"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:membership"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://mashable.com/2011/05/13/open-source-students/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29">
    <title>How Open Source Projects Can Prepare Students for Better Careers</title>
    <dc:date>2011-05-14T13:46:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://mashable.com/2011/05/13/open-source-students/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Mashable+%28Mashable%29</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Working within a FOSS project community brings new benefits. First, there’s the real-world experience of participating in a distributed team. More and more of the world’s software projects are developed in highly connected developer communities around the globe, regardless of whether they are public and liberally licensed or closed and proprietary. The communications and social skills learned from an experience like this will be essential.

Development skills will also be honed. This is achieved through constructive feedback and the experience of working within a mature, well-run FOSS project team. This experience provides version control, configuration management tools, regular automated builds, and testing and packaging issues. These are essential professional software development skills that are seldom well-taught in formal school settings.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source business-culture training collaboration business-school gift-economy-has-its-nose-under-the-tent</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:677f9b89b3e4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:training"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-school"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:gift-economy-has-its-nose-under-the-tent"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html?_r=2&amp;ref=homepage&amp;src=me&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>Rare Sharing of Data Led to Results on Alzheimer’s - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-15T12:08:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/health/research/13alzheimer.html?_r=2&amp;ref=homepage&amp;src=me&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["At first, the collaboration struck many scientists as worrisome — they would be giving up ownership of data, and anyone could use it, publish papers, maybe even misinterpret it and publish information that was wrong.

But Alzheimer’s researchers and drug companies realized they had little choice.

“Companies were caught in a prisoner’s dilemma,” said Dr. Jason Karlawish, an Alzheimer’s researcher at the University of Pennsylvania. “They all wanted to move the field forward, but no one wanted to take the risks of doing it.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture cultural-assumptions competition collaboration public-health alzheimer's</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:604f14ce7ccb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:competition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-health"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:alzheimer's"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php">
    <title>languagehat.com: COLLECTIVE PROTAGORAS TRANSLATION.</title>
    <dc:date>2010-07-04T11:59:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.languagehat.com/archives/003916.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["…I’ve invited readers to comment and offer suggestions to improve the translation. My goal is to communicate Plato in English the way readers of his would have interpreted his Greek, aiming to capture his range of styles (colloquial conversation on the street, philosophical debate, rhetorical displays, poetic analysis, and so on) in a contemporary idiom. The nature of the project requires a wide readership for its success, so I hope you will pass this along."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>crowdsourcing translation openness collaboration classics philosophy academic-publishing disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2786baca0606/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:translation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:classics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://bettermeans.com/front/?page_id=306">
    <title>open enterprise manifesto | bettermeans.com</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-29T13:44:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://bettermeans.com/front/?page_id=306</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Open Enterprise is a new organizational design. Unlike organizations using traditional management structures, Open Enterprises replace the command and control hierarchy with a meritocracy based on collaboration and open participation.

Organizations that adopt this new organizational structure can make decisions faster and respond quicker to their markets. They look more like living dynamic networks, and less like pyramids. People working in these organizations will have (and feel) more ownership. They’re more engaged in their work, and have the freedom to work on what they want, when they want to. Most importantly this model enables people to once again bring their full humanity – values, beliefs and passions – to the workplace, removing disconnect between organizational and personal values"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>worklife transparency coworking collaboration business-culture not-an-employee</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:06c4b0f9bf46/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transparency"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:coworking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-an-employee"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://allthingsthatrise.com/2010/05/02/the-out-crowd-why-crowdsourcing-creative-is-both-smart-and-good/">
    <title>All Things That Rise | The Out Crowd: Why “Crowdsourced Creative” is Both Smart and Good</title>
    <dc:date>2010-06-01T14:31:51+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://allthingsthatrise.com/2010/05/02/the-out-crowd-why-crowdsourcing-creative-is-both-smart-and-good/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['*Platforms that crowdsource the creation of ideas. The idea here is to organize groups of people to innovate, develop new ideas, and solve problems that have eluded organizations that have attempted these things on their own. There are lots of examples of this, from the famed InnoCentive site (most recent challenge: clever solutions for responding to recent oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico); to the $1 million Netflix competition (which enabled the company to develop a superior recommendations system); to the very recent $1 million Edmunds Toyota Prius challenge (“re-create unintended acceleration in a car and then solve that problem and prove the whole thing to us”), to the many experiments that are being conducted at Ideascale, a platform that “empowers communities to drive innovation” by enabling them to collect ideas from “customers, give them a platform to vote, the most important ideas bubble to the top.”'
]]></description>
<dc:subject>crowdsourcing collaboration innovation innovation-factory social-media problem-solving social-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:648ef2eed599/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:crowdsourcing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:innovation-factory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:problem-solving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2672">
    <title>[1005.2672] Proviola: A Tool for Proof Re-animation</title>
    <dc:date>2010-05-18T11:18:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2672</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["With some modifications, the proof movie can be used as the data structure underlying an encyclopedia that we envisage containing formal proofs together with an informal narrative explanation, and provide a toolbox for using and manipulating such composite “articles”…"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>mathematics information-architecture user-generated-content knowledge-management communication communities-of-practice proof collaboration to-read</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c9062317ae73/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:information-architecture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-generated-content"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:knowledge-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communities-of-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:proof"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-read"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4131">
    <title>[1003.4131] Interdisciplinary patterns of a university: Investigating collaboration using co-publication network analysis</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-23T14:59:13+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4131</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We investigate collaborative and interdisciplinary research features of University College Dublin, using methods from social network analysis to analyze and visualize (co-)publications covered by the Web of Science from 1998 through 2007. We account for the extent of interdisciplinarity in collaborations, distinguishing collaborations between schools within one college ("small interdisciplinarity") from collaborations between schools in different colleges ("big interdisciplinarity"). Based on the interdisciplinary nature, we compare the types of collaboration to a model of random matching across units, observing several marked differences. During the period of consideration, collaborations within UC Dublin nearly doubled, almost entirely due to the increasing level of intra-school collaborations."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collaboration interdisciplinarity academic-culture publishing citation-etiquette interdisciplinarians-are-called-shallow-in-two-ways-at-once</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a43505c1a1ad/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interdisciplinarity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-etiquette"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interdisciplinarians-are-called-shallow-in-two-ways-at-once"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6374.html">
    <title>The Determinants of Individual Performance and Collective Value in Private-Collective Software Innovation — HBS Working Knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2010-03-07T22:12:16+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6374.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["We investigate if the actions by individuals in creating effective new innovations are aligned with the reuse of those innovations by others in a private-collective software development context. …"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>open-source collaboration whuffie-culture software-development social-norms business-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:29755f7e9cc1/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:whuffie-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software-development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2010/01/reshaping-relationships-through-passion.html">
    <title>Edge Perspectives with John Hagel: Reshaping Relationships through Passion</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-30T22:41:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://edgeperspectives.typepad.com/edge_perspectives/2010/01/reshaping-relationships-through-passion.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The Big Shift suggests we are moving away from a world where stocks of knowledge and short-lived transactions are the key to success. In its place, we find a world where participation in many, diverse flows of knowledge and long-term, trust-based relationships determine success. In this new world, shy people can be at a significant disadvantage. We run the risk of becoming increasingly stressed and marginalized by the extroverts who welcome the opportunity to broaden and deepen relationships. They thrive in crowded rooms while we are deeply uncomfortable with exposing and sharing."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-norms learning network-culture stock-and-flow cultural-dynamics knowledge collaboration trust</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:431bf3c13d12/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:stock-and-flow"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trust"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>