<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://medium.com/@umpox/be-careful-what-you-copy-invisibly-inserting-usernames-into-text-with-zero-width-characters-18b4e6f17b66"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.2333/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11681"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2216"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1934"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://medium.com/@umpox/be-careful-what-you-copy-invisibly-inserting-usernames-into-text-with-zero-width-characters-18b4e6f17b66">
    <title>Be careful what you copy: Invisibly inserting usernames into text with Zero-Width Characters | by Tom Ross | Medium</title>
    <dc:date>2021-01-14T12:44:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://medium.com/@umpox/be-careful-what-you-copy-invisibly-inserting-usernames-into-text-with-zero-width-characters-18b4e6f17b66</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Zero-width characters are invisible, ‘non-printing’ characters that are not displayed by the majority of applications. F​or exam​ple, I’ve ins​erted 10 ze​ro-width spa​ces in​to thi​s sentence, c​an you tel​​l? (Hint: paste the sentence into Diff Checker to see the locations of the characters!). These characters can be used to ‘fingerprint’ text for certain users.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>steganography security tracking web-design rather-interesting privacy citation-networks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:aa9678787660/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:steganography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:tracking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web-design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:privacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-networks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.2333/">
    <title>Is Scholarly Publishing Like Rock and Roll?</title>
    <dc:date>2020-11-14T11:40:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://jlsc-pub.org/articles/abstract/10.7710/2162-3309.2333/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This article uses Alan B. Krueger’s analysis of the music industry in his book Rockonomics: A Backstage Tour of What the Music Industry Can Teach Us About Economics and Life as a lens to consider the structure of scholarly publishing and what could happen to scholarly publishing going forward. Both the music industry and scholarly publishing are facing disruption as their products become digital. Digital content provides opportunities to a create a better product at lower prices and in the music industry this has happened. Scholarly publishing has not yet done so. Similarities and differences between the music industry and scholarly publishing will be considered. Like music, scholarly publishing appears to be a superstar industry. Both music and scholarly publishing are subject to piracy, which threatens revenue, though Napster was a greater disrupter than Sci-Hub seems to be. It also appears that for a variety of reasons market forces are not effective in driving changes in business models and practices in scholarly publishing, at least not at the rate we would expect given the changes in technology. After reviewing similarities and differences, the prospects for the future of scholarly publishing will be considered.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:several academic-culture publishing citation-networks analogies long-tails economics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cf48f8c5f1c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:several"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:analogies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:long-tails"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11681">
    <title>[1908.11681] Refinement of Metrics: Erdős Number, a Case Study</title>
    <dc:date>2019-09-21T11:01:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.11681</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We introduce a concept called refinement and develop two different ways of refining metrics. By applying these methods we produce several refinements of the shortest-path distance on the collaboration graph and hence a couple new versions of the Erdős number.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>what-gets-measured-gets-fudged rather-interesting to-write-about social-networks citation-networks feature-construction group-theory define-your-terms</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:354cb4f5d67d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:what-gets-measured-gets-fudged"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:feature-construction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:group-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:define-your-terms"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2216">
    <title>[1206.2216] Complex Systems Science: Dreams of Universality, Reality of Interdisciplinarity</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-24T13:37:08+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.2216</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Using a large database (~ 215 000 records) of relevant articles, we empirically study the "complex systems" field and its claims to find universal principles applying to systems in general. The study of references shared by the papers allows us to obtain a global point of view on the structure of this highly interdisciplinary field. We show that its overall coherence does not arise from a universal theory but instead from computational techniques and fruitful adaptations of the idea of self-organization to specific systems. We also find that communication between different disciplines goes through specific "trading zones", ie sub-communities that create an interface around specific tools (a DNA microchip) or concepts (a network)."]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cshalizi complexology professionalization network-theory disappointed-by-lack-of-Abbott-ref citation-networks</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8bd448c060a3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:professionalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disappointed-by-lack-of-Abbott-ref"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-networks"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1934">
    <title>[1102.1934] The structure of the Arts &amp; Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals</title>
    <dc:date>2011-08-25T13:31:24+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1102.1934</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) 2008, we apply mapping techniques previously developed for mapping journal structures in the Science and Social Science Citation Indices. Citation relations among the 110,718 records were aggregated at the level of 1,157 journals specific to the A&HCI, and the journal structures are questioned on whether a cognitive structure can be reconstructed and visualized. Both cosine-normalization (bottom up) and factor analysis (top down) suggest a division into approximately twelve subsets. The relations among these subsets are explored using various visualization techniques. However, we were not able to retrieve this structure using the ISI Subject Categories, including the 25 categories which are specific to the A&HCI. We discuss options for validation such as against the categories of the Humanities Indicators of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the panel structure of the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH), and compare our results with the curriculum organization of the Humanities Section of the College of Letters and Sciences of UCLA as an example of institutional organization."]]></description>
<dc:subject>network-theory citation-networks humanities academic-culture quantitative-humanities</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:416f7e9ca187/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:network-theory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:humanities"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:quantitative-humanities"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>