<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://laudatortemporisacti.blogspot.com/2021/08/writing-versus-speaking.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://freedomnews.org.uk/interview-ruth-kinna/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167475"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2013/01/11/apres-le-perturbation/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/12/25/guest-post-stephanie-tai-on-deference-to-experts/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1985/12/the-case-against-credentialism/8286/?single_page=true"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2011/02/01/i-would-have-had-my-great-books-too-if-it-werent-for-those-meddling-hippies/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://airspeedonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/large-aircraft-security-program-capt.html#links"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://marketsci.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/if-it%E2%80%99s-not-audited-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-count/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.elpub.net/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.somebits.com/weblog/culture/music/portishead-third-leak.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.kellscraft.com/bookeditionpage/bookeditionsinfopage.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.greenchameleon.com/gc/blog_detail/snake_oil/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/absolute-author.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.geocities.com/Nick_Levinson/law/const_proofrdg/article.htm"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/009567.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/which-came-first-part-three-can-george-lionel-and-marmaduke-help-us-order-the-fenton-photographs/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/berkman_lunch_aaron_swartz_on.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.jimzwick.net/more_copyright_violations.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.zotero.org/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/07/how_should_unpr.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/knowledge-access-as-a-public-good/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://patahistory.blogspot.com/2007/04/digital-history-in-twenty-first.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://laudatortemporisacti.blogspot.com/2021/08/writing-versus-speaking.html">
    <title>Laudator Temporis Acti: Writing versus Speaking</title>
    <dc:date>2022-04-02T12:39:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://laudatortemporisacti.blogspot.com/2021/08/writing-versus-speaking.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Scholars and writers are apt to dismiss words not immortalized on the page, issuing merely from the lips. People lie, repeat themselves, contradict what they've just said, phumph and jabber endlessly. Singers and storytellers, bombastic preachers, drunken barroom rhetoricians, fast-talking salesmen, Don Juans purveying sugarcoated come-ons—all were past masters of the shady arts of speech. We may listen, but we don't entirely trust; many of us want to see it in black and white, laid out on the page in front of us. Without that reassuring superstructure of print, speech and song can seem deficient.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>writing ephemerality authority rather-interesting worth-quoting rewriting-project</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:505440da68cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:writing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ephemerality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worth-quoting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rewriting-project"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="https://freedomnews.org.uk/interview-ruth-kinna/">
    <title>Interview: Ruth Kinna – Freedom News</title>
    <dc:date>2020-05-02T11:00:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://freedomnews.org.uk/interview-ruth-kinna/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Armand’s idea was that all institutions and relationships could be anarchised, in the same way that they could be liberalised. The difference would be that liberalising would typically result in an extension or recognition of rights, leaving both mainframes and micro-expressions of power intact, whereas anarchising involves challenging prevailing principles of authority, systems of domination and entrenchments of power. I like it because I think it helps make huge problems seem more manageable or imaginable. For example, I find it difficult to contemplate what the abolition of capitalism or the state involves. I can begin to think about the anarchisation of consumption or transport or health or education. Mutual aid is a big part of it, in that it asserts some basic principles for rebuilding social relationships. But anarchising helpfully emphasises how the environmental dimensions of Kropotkin’s concept may be aligned to constructive dismantling of exploitative institutions and practices.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>anarchism authority goals interview political-economy succinctly-put history anarchisation</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8fca6b9a723b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anarchism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:goals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:political-economy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:succinctly-put"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anarchisation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167475">
    <title>Scholarly Context Adrift: Three out of Four URI References Lead to Changed Content</title>
    <dc:date>2017-07-26T13:57:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0167475</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Increasingly, scholarly articles contain URI references to “web at large” resources including project web sites, scholarly wikis, ontologies, online debates, presentations, blogs, and videos. Authors reference such resources to provide essential context for the research they report on. A reader who visits a web at large resource by following a URI reference in an article, some time after its publication, is led to believe that the resource’s content is representative of what the author originally referenced. However, due to the dynamic nature of the web, that may very well not be the case. We reuse a dataset from a previous study in which several authors of this paper were involved, and investigate to what extent the textual content of web at large resources referenced in a vast collection of Science, Technology, and Medicine (STM) articles published between 1997 and 2012 has remained stable since the publication of the referencing article. We do so in a two-step approach that relies on various well-established similarity measures to compare textual content. In a first step, we use 19 web archives to find snapshots of referenced web at large resources that have textual content that is representative of the state of the resource around the time of publication of the referencing paper. We find that representative snapshots exist for about 30% of all URI references. In a second step, we compare the textual content of representative snapshots with that of their live web counterparts. We find that for over 75% of references the content has drifted away from what it was when referenced. These results raise significant concerns regarding the long term integrity of the web-based scholarly record and call for the deployment of techniques to combat these problems.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture citation authority ephemerality philosophy-of-science to-write-about the-Great-Discontinuity</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:cd5f7d62e555/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ephemerality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-Great-Discontinuity"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916">
    <title>Language Log » Reliability</title>
    <dc:date>2015-03-03T11:29:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17916</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[But in my opinion, the central issues in this area are not statistical but cultural. And what I learned at the workshop confirmed this belief.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>academic-culture science philosophy-of-science the-mangle-in-practice cultural-assumptions authority Misrepresentations</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1e646cd93370/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:the-mangle-in-practice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Misrepresentations"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2013/01/11/apres-le-perturbation/">
    <title>Apres Le Perturbation | Easily Distracted</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-12T16:32:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2013/01/11/apres-le-perturbation/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[3) In the 20th Century, we accepted the institutionalized, routinized use of people with ostensibly high-value professional training for tasks that didn’t require their expertise. Or well before the intrusion of certain kinds of rationalizing economies, the professions devalued their own work. Professors moved to marginalize and massify teaching before their administrations required them to do so, doctors moved to minimize contact with patients before insurers asked it of them, law firms assigned young lawyers to mechanically process large bodies of documentation in the discovery phase of litigation, and so on. The professions cleared the way for their own reorganization and mechanization largely to create more privileged terms of labor for the most senior or powerful professionals. This was a brief moment in the history of the professions, especially marked in the 1960s and 1970s, but it opened the way for what came later. If the current disruption has positive value, it might be to spur professionals to identify far more sharply what kinds of labor require extensive credentialing and training and to understand where there is a mismatch between the needs of the professions and the training they have insisted upon to this point. Some of this has already happened, either under duress or as a creative response to changed circumstances. More needs to happen.

]]></description>
<dc:subject>credentialing professionalism publishing medicine authority disintermediation-in-action</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:dcc9acae5cf5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentialing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:professionalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:medicine"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/12/25/guest-post-stephanie-tai-on-deference-to-experts/">
    <title>Guest post: Stephanie Tai on deference to experts « Quomodocumque</title>
    <dc:date>2013-01-01T15:51:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://quomodocumque.wordpress.com/2012/12/25/guest-post-stephanie-tai-on-deference-to-experts/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["So how to address this balance between skepticism and lack of time to do full inquiries into everything? I totally don’t have the answers, though the kind of stuff I explore are procedural ways to address these issues, at least when legal decisions are raised–for example,..."]]></description>
<dc:subject>credentialing authority reasonableness explanation engagement public-policy academic-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2248cb06ac0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentialing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reasonableness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:explanation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:engagement"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academic-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1985/12/the-case-against-credentialism/8286/?single_page=true">
    <title>Magazine - The Case Against Credentialism - The Atlantic</title>
    <dc:date>2012-06-19T22:24:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1985/12/the-case-against-credentialism/8286/?single_page=true</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA['"ALL OF OUR WORK HAS GIVEN ME A VERY STRONG view,” Richard Boyatzis told me one afternoon. The consulting firm Boyatzis heads, McBer and Company, was founded by David McClelland in 1963. Its specialty has been analyzing what people actually do in business jobs—not what their job descriptions say, but how they spend their time and which skills seem most important to their success. “I've come to see that whenever a group institutes a credentialing process, whether by licensing or insisting on advanced degrees, the espoused rhetoric is to enforce the standards of professionalism. This is true whether it's among accountants or plumbers or physicians. But the observed consequences always seem to be these two: the exclusion of certain groups, whether by intention or not, and the establishment of mediocre performance standards."']]></description>
<dc:subject>professionalization credentialing Andrew-Abbott-smiles-in-Chicago authority expertise cultural-assumptions disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c7afbdbf8433/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:professionalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentialing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Andrew-Abbott-smiles-in-Chicago"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2011/02/01/i-would-have-had-my-great-books-too-if-it-werent-for-those-meddling-hippies/">
    <title>I Would Have Had My Great Books, Too, If It Weren’t For Those Meddling Hippies « Easily Distracted</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-02T13:26:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://weblogs.swarthmore.edu/burke/2011/02/01/i-would-have-had-my-great-books-too-if-it-werent-for-those-meddling-hippies/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["… Edmundson, similar to some conservative or traditionalist humanists, believes in a command model. The public only valued literature because the critics told them to. The public only understood literature because the critics told them what it meant. The public only read literature because the critics lead them through the reading of it. Once the commandment vanished, so did the Western tradition itself, and with extraordinary rapidity."]]></description>
<dc:subject>literary-criticism history-done-right disintermediation-in-action decredentialing authority</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0e58aa0eb4c8/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:literary-criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history-done-right"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-in-action"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:decredentialing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html">
    <title>PressThink: Audience Atomization Overcome: Why the Internet Weakens the Authority of the Press</title>
    <dc:date>2010-01-21T14:06:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/2009/01/12/atomization.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized-- connected "up" to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding. I will try to explain why.
It’s easily the most useful diagram I’ve found for understanding the practice of journalism in the United States, and the hidden politics of that practice. You can draw it by hand right now. Take a sheet of paper and make a big circle in the middle. In the center of that circle draw a smaller one to create a doughnut shape. Label the doughnut hole “sphere of consensus.” Call the middle region “sphere of legitimate debate,” and the outer region “sphere of deviance.”"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism media social-norms social-dynamics discourse politics communication criticism authority newspapers analysis consensus disintermediation-targets</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c1eb7ca143e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-dynamics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:discourse"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:analysis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consensus"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:disintermediation-targets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://airspeedonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/large-aircraft-security-program-capt.html#links">
    <title>Airspeed: Large Aircraft Security Program - Capt Force Speaks Out</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-24T18:05:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://airspeedonline.blogspot.com/2009/02/large-aircraft-security-program-capt.html#links</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["If I get enough named supporters so it looks like a real show of force, I’ll include the list in the spot at the bottom. If I don’t get a big response, I’ll probably leave the list of supporters off. Either way, your expression of support will be appreciated.

Note that I am very upset over the proposed rule and the text and tone of my comment reflects this as best I know how without using profanity. And the proposal deserves profanity. If you work for an alphabet organization or otherwise have a relationship with the TSA that requires not angering the TSA, this is not the comment with which you want to be associated. Only the brave and the independent need sign up here."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>TSA government regulation security-theater law aircraft transportation security authority public-policy Bushism bad-design</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c0b9d62a5dff/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:TSA"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:government"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:regulation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:security-theater"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:aircraft"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:transportation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:security"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Bushism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bad-design"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://marketsci.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/if-it%E2%80%99s-not-audited-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-count/">
    <title>If it’s not Audited, It Doesn’t Count « MarketSci Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2009-01-04T12:49:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://marketsci.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/if-it%E2%80%99s-not-audited-it-doesn%E2%80%99t-count/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["A logic question.  Which financial professionals would be more likely to be audited: bad ones or good ones?  Logically, I would say good ones – if you’re bad, you want to hide it – if you’re good, you want to prove it.  Now I’m not saying all audited professionals are good, or all unaudited professionals are bad, but on par I think it’s fair to say that audited professionals are better."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>auditing finance trading statistics authority credentials</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:369eda55690f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:auditing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:finance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:trading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credentials"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.elpub.net/">
    <title>Open Scholarship</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-26T22:03:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.elpub.net/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>conferences elearning libraries web scholarship academia authority digitization</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:05e20bb9384d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:conferences"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:elearning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.somebits.com/weblog/culture/music/portishead-third-leak.html">
    <title>Nelson's Weblog: culture / music / portishead-third-leak</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-22T15:34:28+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.somebits.com/weblog/culture/music/portishead-third-leak.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>authority digitization distribution sharing error</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:9a2fd280450e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distribution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sharing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:error"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.kellscraft.com/bookeditionpage/bookeditionsinfopage.html">
    <title>Original Book Editions Information Page</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-22T15:26:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.kellscraft.com/bookeditionpage/bookeditionsinfopage.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Unfortunately, some web sites alter the books you are reading on-line in subtle ways that you, the reader may not be aware of: they use blended books."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>public-domain authority digitization publishing ebooks cultural-norms community bookseller mashup editing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:990d9762ae0d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-domain"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:digitization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ebooks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bookseller"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mashup"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.greenchameleon.com/gc/blog_detail/snake_oil/">
    <title>Green Chameleon &quot; Snake Oil</title>
    <dc:date>2008-04-06T12:35:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.greenchameleon.com/gc/blog_detail/snake_oil/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:tsuomela KM knowledge-management authority self-definition criticism terminology</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8f93ba55150f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:tsuomela"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:KM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:knowledge-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:self-definition"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:criticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:terminology"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/absolute-author.html">
    <title>Overcoming Bias: Absolute Authority</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-09T22:56:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.overcomingbias.com/2008/01/absolute-author.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This experience, I fear, maps the domain of belief onto the social domains of authority, of command, of law."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>bias science pedagogy fallacy religion authority psychology sociology philosophy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0e54a58980cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fallacy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:religion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:psychology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.geocities.com/Nick_Levinson/law/const_proofrdg/article.htm">
    <title>The Constitution: Has Anyone Proofread Our Copies?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-01-06T12:18:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.geocities.com/Nick_Levinson/law/const_proofrdg/article.htm</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:britta Constitution proofreading version-control philosophy law authority</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:681ba941d4e3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:britta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Constitution"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:proofreading"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:version-control"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html">
    <title>Official Google Blog: Encouraging people to contribute knowledge</title>
    <dc:date>2007-12-14T14:37:22+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/12/encouraging-people-to-contribute.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Redisintermediating the collective since 2008 or so.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia Google collaboration collective expertise credit social-networks reputation authority</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:61030df260fd/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collective"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:credit"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reputation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/009567.html">
    <title>Making Light: The war on photography</title>
    <dc:date>2007-11-10T19:36:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/009567.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>terrorism freedom photography fascism Bushism authority amateurism sad</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ddf8f45b5518/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:terrorism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:freedom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:fascism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Bushism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:amateurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sad"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/which-came-first-part-three-can-george-lionel-and-marmaduke-help-us-order-the-fenton-photographs/">
    <title>Which Came First? (Part Three): Can George, Lionel and Marmaduke Help Us Order the Fenton Photographs? - Errol Morris - Zoom - New York Times Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T11:41:00+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://morris.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/23/which-came-first-part-three-can-george-lionel-and-marmaduke-help-us-order-the-fenton-photographs/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Today, possibly because of Photoshop and other photography-doctoring software, people have become suspicious of photographs. This is a good thing."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:arthegall authority photography history nanohistory science preservation reenactment</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2dbcda961de7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:arthegall"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:photography"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nanohistory"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:preservation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reenactment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/berkman_lunch_aaron_swartz_on.html">
    <title>Joho the Blog: Berkman lunch: Aaron Swartz on Open Library</title>
    <dc:date>2007-10-24T11:14:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/mtarchive/berkman_lunch_aaron_swartz_on.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[And I did not see this before I wrote my call to war. Something in the air.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>archiving preservation openness cultural-norms libraries access open-access copyright authority books database structure short-sighted</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:64478534e886/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archiving"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:preservation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libraries"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-access"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:database"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:structure"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:short-sighted"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.jimzwick.net/more_copyright_violations.html">
    <title>More on Copyright Violations by the Internet Archive</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-18T01:10:44+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.jimzwick.net/more_copyright_violations.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Man does not like IA.org
]]></description>
<dc:subject>rant copyright intellectual-property archive cultural-norms social-norms economics agalmics authors authority commons ownership</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8dd2923308b9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rant"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:copyright"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:intellectual-property"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agalmics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authors"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ownership"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.zotero.org/">
    <title>Zotero - The Next-Generation Research Tool</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-12T21:12:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.zotero.org/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:logista collaboration citation authority research scholarship community social-norms web2.0 firefox annotation</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:25d81b8f75c7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:logista"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:firefox"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:annotation"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/07/how_should_unpr.html">
    <title>How should unproven findings be publicized?</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-10T11:37:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/archives/2007/07/how_should_unpr.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>science research statistics publishing social-norms authority citation promotion openness open-sc</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:ef17f530160a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:research"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:citation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:promotion"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-sc"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php">
    <title>Open Reading Frame</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-07T21:09:56+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.sennoma.net/main/archives/2007/05/damn_good_idea.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Catching up on old posts of new-discoverd blog: Open-access peer reviewers' comments. Good idea.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>openness open-science collaboration peer-review academia publishing authority comments</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:7f6575e1092e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:peer-review"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:comments"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/knowledge-access-as-a-public-good/">
    <title>Knowledge Access as a Public Good - Britannica Blog</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-27T22:12:48+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.britannica.com/blog/main/2007/06/knowledge-access-as-a-public-good/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:hrheingold wiki wikipedia authority academia scholarship archive publishing cultural-norms knowledge economics pedagogy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:0a74f40d0af7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:hrheingold"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wiki"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:archive"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:knowledge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://patahistory.blogspot.com/2007/04/digital-history-in-twenty-first.html">
    <title>Patahistory: &lt;br&gt;A Hot &amp; Infinitely Dense Blog: Digital History in the Twenty-first Century: An Introduction to History 2.0</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-20T12:05:41+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://patahistory.blogspot.com/2007/04/digital-history-in-twenty-first.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Small, swarming doses of scholarship. Are they <i>still</i> scholarly, then? Or something utterly different?
]]></description>
<dc:subject>web2.0 history academia scholarship cultural-norms worklife collaboration authority distributed</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e1219bf12e26/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:authority"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:distributed"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>