<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Vaguery)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Vaguery</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06498"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://evonomics.com/the-only-woman-to-win-the-nobel-prize-economics-debunked/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3600"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4643"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0925"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6184"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4683"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0941"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/clay-shirky-on-the-collapse-of-complex-business-models.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2010/02/times-whiffs-again.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/archives/026967.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/02/all-correlations-are-equal-to-one.html#comments"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2008/12/11/my-least-favorite-interview-question/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001226.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009257.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://harpers.org/archive/2005/05/0080538"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.interfluidity.com/posts/1160447599.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://evolvingwe.com/business/7-things-you-can-t-say-on-the-internet/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://publishing2.com/2008/06/04/what-newspapers-still-dont-understand-about-the-web/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.boardwalkcreative.com/photo_gallery.php"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.existenceiswonderful.com/2008/02/no-singing-allowed-assumptions-and.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2007/09/03/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://metacool.typepad.com/metacool/2007/06/john_lilly_the_.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.relevancellc.com/2007/6/2/ruby-vs-java-myth-1-project-size"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://devgrind.com/2007/04/25/how-to-not-solve-a-sudoku/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06498">
    <title>[2203.06498] The worst of both worlds: A comparative analysis of errors in learning from data in psychology and machine learning</title>
    <dc:date>2022-04-02T12:26:36+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06498</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Recent concerns that machine learning (ML) may be facing a reproducibility and replication crisis suggest that some published claims in ML research cannot be taken at face value. These concerns inspire analogies to the replication crisis affecting the social and medical sciences, as well as calls for greater integration of statistical approaches to causal inference and predictive modeling. A deeper understanding of what reproducibility concerns in research in supervised ML have in common with the replication crisis in experimental science can put the new concerns in perspective, and help researchers avoid "the worst of both worlds" that can emerge when ML researchers begin borrowing methodologies from explanatory modeling without understanding their limitations, and vice versa. We contribute a comparative analysis of concerns about inductive learning that arise in different stages of the modeling pipeline in causal attribution as exemplified in psychology versus predictive modeling as exemplified by ML. We identify themes that re-occur in reform discussions like overreliance on asymptotic theory and non-credible beliefs about real-world data generating processes. We argue that in both fields, claims from learning are implied to generalize outside the specific environment studied (e.g., the input dataset or subject sample, modeling implementation, etc.) but are often impossible to refute due to forms of underspecification. In particular, many errors being acknowledged in ML expose cracks in long-held beliefs that optimizing predictive accuracy using huge datasets absolves one from having to make assumptions about the underlying data generating process. We conclude by discussing rhetorical risks like error misdiagnosis that arise in times of methodological uncertainty.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:cshalizi statistics machine-learning reproducibility science-studies models-and-modes assumptions rather-interesting consider:looking-to-see</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6d5f50bf1656/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:cshalizi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:reproducibility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:science-studies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:looking-to-see"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://evonomics.com/the-only-woman-to-win-the-nobel-prize-economics-debunked/">
    <title>The Only Woman to Win the Nobel Prize in Economics Also Debunked the Orthodoxy - Evonomics</title>
    <dc:date>2018-05-16T12:30:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://evonomics.com/the-only-woman-to-win-the-nobel-prize-economics-debunked/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I mention Lloyd’s essay to illustrate how ridiculous yet persistent the misconceptions about the “tragedy” dynamic truly are. Commons scholar Lewis Hyde dryly notes, “Just as Hardin proposes a herdsman whose reason is unable to encompass the common good, so Lloyd supposes persons who have no way to speak with each other or make joint decisions. Both writers inject laissez-faire individualism into an old agrarian village and then gravely announce that the commons is dead. From the point of view of such a village, Lloyd’s assumptions are as crazy as asking us to ‘suppose a man to have a purse to which his left and right hand may freely resort, each unaware of the other’.”

This absurdity, unfortunately, is the basis for a large literature of “prisoner’s dilemma” experiments that purport to show how “rational individuals” behave when confronted with “social dilemmas,” such as how to allocate a limited resource. Should the “prisoner” cooperate with other potential claimants and share the limited rewards? Or should he or she defect by grabbing as much for himself as possible?

]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics ideology public-policy models-and-modes commons to-write-about theory-and-practice-sitting-in-a-tree libertarianism assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:84d60963032c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:ideology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:commons"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:to-write-about"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:theory-and-practice-sitting-in-a-tree"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:libertarianism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3600">
    <title>[1409.3600] Select with Groups of $3$ or $4$ Takes Linear Time</title>
    <dc:date>2016-04-11T12:29:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.3600</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We revisit the selection problem, namely that of computing the ith order statistic of n given elements, in particular the classical deterministic algorithm by grouping and partition due to Blum, Floyd, Pratt, Rivest, and Tarjan~(1973). While the original algorithm uses groups of odd size at least 5 and runs in linear time, it has been perpetuated in the literature that using groups of 3 or 4 will force the worst-case running time to become superlinear, namely Ω(nlogn). We first point out that the arguments existent in the literature justifying the superlinear worst-case running time fall short of proving the claim. We further prove that it is possible to use group size 3 or 4 while maintaining the worst case linear running time. To this end we introduce two simple variants of the classical algorithm, the repeated step algorithm and the shifting target algorithm, both running in linear time.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>computational-complexity algorithms robustness assumptions rather-interesting nudge-targets consider:looking-to-see consider:performance-measures</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:d16d3cd78321/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:computational-complexity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:robustness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:looking-to-see"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:performance-measures"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4643">
    <title>[1406.4643] Vector Quantile Regression</title>
    <dc:date>2015-01-19T11:10:47+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.4643</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We propose a notion of conditional vector quantile function and a vector quantile regression. 
A conditional vector quantile function (CVQF) of a random vector Y, taking values in ℝd given covariates Z=z, taking values in ℝk, is a map u↦QY∣Z(u,z), which is monotone, in the sense of being a gradient of a convex function, and such that given that vector U follows a reference non-atomic distribution FU, for instance uniform distribution on a unit cube in ℝd, the random vector QY∣Z(U,z) has the distribution of Y conditional on Z=z. Moreover, we have a strong representation, Y=QY∣Z(U,Z) almost surely, for some version of U. 
The vector quantile regression (VQR) is a linear model for CVQF of Y given Z. Under correct specification, the notion produces strong representation, Y=β(U)⊤f(Z), for f(Z) denoting a known set of transformations of Z, where u↦β(u)⊤f(Z) is a monotone map, the gradient of a convex function, and the quantile regression coefficients u↦β(u) have the interpretations analogous to that of the standard scalar quantile regression. As f(Z) becomes a richer class of transformations of Z, the model becomes nonparametric, as in series modelling. A key property of VQR is the embedding of the classical Monge-Kantorovich's optimal transportation problem at its core as a special case. 
In the classical case, where Y is scalar, VQR reduces to a version of the classical QR, and CVQF reduces to the scalar conditional quantile function. Several applications to diverse problems such as multiple Engel curve estimation, and measurement of financial risk, are considered.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>statistics economics rather-interesting multiobjective-optimization assumptions models-and-modes modeling-is-not-mathematics notable-datasets</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2d2894c3c18d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rather-interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:multiobjective-optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models-and-modes"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling-is-not-mathematics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:notable-datasets"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0925">
    <title>[1312.0925] Understanding Alternating Minimization for Matrix Completion</title>
    <dc:date>2014-09-28T12:07:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0925</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Alternating Minimization is a widely used and empirically successful heuristic for matrix completion and related low-rank optimization problems. Theoretical guarantees for Alternating Minimization have been hard to come by and are still poorly understood. This is in part because the heuristic is iterative and non-convex in nature. We give a new algorithm based on Alternating Minimization that provably recovers an unknown low-rank matrix from a random subsample of its entries under a standard incoherence assumption. Our results reduce the sample size requirements of the Alternating Minimization approach by at least a quartic factor in the rank and the condition number of the unknown matrix. These improvements apply even if the matrix is only close to low-rank in the Frobenius norm. Our algorithm runs in nearly linear time in the dimension of the matrix and, in a broad range of parameters, gives the strongest sample bounds among all subquadratic time algorithms that we are aware of. 
Underlying our work is a new robust convergence analysis of the well-known Power Method for computing the dominant singular vectors of a matrix. This viewpoint leads to a conceptually simple understanding of Alternating Minimization. In addition, we contribute a new technique for controlling the coherence of intermediate solutions arising in iterative algorithms based on a smoothed analysis of the QR factorization. These techniques may be of interest beyond their application here.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>matrices optimization statistics modeling algorithms inference assumptions philosophy-of-science nudge-targets consider:loads-of-stuff</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:1b3065dc86e5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:matrices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:optimization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:inference"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:philosophy-of-science"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:consider:loads-of-stuff"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6184">
    <title>[1312.6184] Do Deep Nets Really Need to be Deep?</title>
    <dc:date>2014-03-17T12:31:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6184</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Currently, deep neural networks are the state of the art on problems such as speech recognition and computer vision. In this extended abstract, we show that shallow feed-forward networks can learn the complex functions previously learned by deep nets and achieve accuracies previously only achievable with deep models. Moreover, in some cases the shallow neural nets can learn these deep functions using a total number of parameters similar to the original deep model. We evaluate our method on the TIMIT phoneme recognition task and are able to train shallow fully-connected nets that perform similarly to complex, well-engineered, deep convolutional architectures. Our success in training shallow neural nets to mimic deeper models suggests that there probably exist better algorithms for training shallow feed-forward nets than those currently available.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>deep-learning neural-networks yeah-I-was-wondering-that-too machine-learning assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:87fa7d095dcc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:deep-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:neural-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:yeah-I-was-wondering-that-too"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:machine-learning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4683">
    <title>[1205.4683] How women organize social networks different from men</title>
    <dc:date>2013-07-21T14:31:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.4683</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Superpositions of social networks, such as communication, friendship, or trade networks, are called multiplex networks, forming the structural backbone of human societies. Novel datasets now allow quantification and exploration of multiplex networks. Here we study gender-specific differences of a multiplex network from a complete behavioral dataset of an online-game society of about 300,000 players. On the individual level females perform better economically and are less risk-taking than males. Males reciprocate friendship requests from females faster than vice versa and hesitate to reciprocate hostile actions of females. On the network level females have more communication partners, who are less connected than partners of males. We find a strong homophily effect for females and higher clustering coefficients of females in trade and attack networks. Cooperative links between males are under-represented, reflecting competition for resources among males. These results confirm quantitatively that females and males manage their social networks in substantially different ways.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-networks in-the-wild cultural-norms games assumptions experiment</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:923b592ee1e7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:in-the-wild"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:games"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:experiment"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0941">
    <title>[1008.0941] Timing matters: Lessons From The CA Literature On Updating</title>
    <dc:date>2010-08-12T19:32:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.0941</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["In the present article we emphasize the importance of modeling time in the context of agent-based models. To this end, we present a (selective) survey of the Cellular Automata-literature on updating and draw parallels to the issue of agent activation in agent-based models. By means of two simple models, Schelling's segregation model and Epstein's demographic prisoner's dilemma we investigate the influence of choosing different regimes of agent activation. Our experiments indicate that timing is not a critical issue for very simple models but bears huge influence on model behavior and results as soon as the degree of complexity increases only so slightly. After a brief review of the way commonly used ABM simulation environments handle the issue of timing, we draw some tentative conclusions about the importance of timing and the need for more research towards that direction, similar to the concerted effort on updating in cellular automata."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>cellular-automata complexology best-practices assumptions agent-based bias nudge-targets?</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a2a2c8ef5df9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cellular-automata"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:complexology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:best-practices"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agent-based"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:nudge-targets?"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/clay-shirky-on-the-collapse-of-complex-business-models.html">
    <title>Stowe Boyd - /message - Clay Shirky on The Collapse Of Complex Business Models</title>
    <dc:date>2010-04-03T11:06:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/clay-shirky-on-the-collapse-of-complex-business-models.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["When complex systems collapse, it starts by people simply wandering away, going over the hill. They don't pay their taxes to Rome anymore. They ignore copyright protections. They accept inferior web hosting for $6/month from some low rent company, instead of paying AT&T $60. They make videos with a Flip camera instead of a $20,000 Betamax."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>collapsonomics sociology business-culture business-model assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:beca417ccd75/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collapsonomics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2010/02/times-whiffs-again.html">
    <title>Confessions of a Community College Dean: The Times Whiffs Again</title>
    <dc:date>2010-02-05T16:07:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://suburbdad.blogspot.com/2010/02/times-whiffs-again.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Several alert readers sent me links to this article from the New York Times. It's a weirdly chipper "pick up some money in your spare time by adjuncting!" piece, written for (and apparently by) people who aren't terribly conversant in higher ed.

Depending on your angle to the universe, it could be read as refreshing, bizarre, or deeply offensive. (I fall into the 'bizarre' camp, with sympathies for the 'deeply offensive.')"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>education academia adjunct worklife assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:c4be2dd8ec74/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:education"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:adjunct"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/archives/026967.php">
    <title>Poor Mojo Newswire: Another 345,000 jobs evaporated in May; unemployment nearing historic high</title>
    <dc:date>2009-06-06T19:59:05+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.poormojo.org/pmjadaily/archives/026967.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["This disconnect is a reflection of the way in which the government collects jobs data. The number of jobs comes from a survey of employers, while the unemployment data is derived from a survey of households. In April and May, the number of people who told surveyors they were actively looking for work increased by more than one million. These people would have previously been excluded from the unemployment calculation as not being part of the labor force. Now, they are back in the hunt — an apparent sign of improvement — yet struggling to secure positions in a still awful market."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>notanemployee financial-crisis emplyment statistics public-policy data-collection assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e95711f9ebb6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:notanemployee"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:financial-crisis"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:emplyment"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:statistics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:data-collection"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/02/all-correlations-are-equal-to-one.html#comments">
    <title>Grasping Reality with Both Hands: All Correlations Are Equal to One</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-25T14:50:15+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://delong.typepad.com/sdj/2009/02/all-correlations-are-equal-to-one.html#comments</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The damage was foreseeable and, in fact, foreseen. In 1998, before Li had even invented his copula function, Paul Wilmott wrote that "the correlations between financial quantities are notoriously unstable." Wilmott, a quantitative-finance consultant and lecturer, argued that no theory should be built on such unpredictable parameters. And he wasn't alone. During the boom years, everybody could reel off reasons why the Gaussian copula function wasn't perfect. Li's approach made no allowance for unpredictability: It assumed that correlation was a constant rather than something mercurial. Investment banks would regularly phone Stanford's Duffie and ask him to come in and talk to them about exactly what Li's copula was. Every time, he would warn them that it was not suitable for use in risk management or valuation..."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:alevin models modeling assumptions economics financial-engineering correlation not-learning-from-data it's-not-rocket-science-(no-really -it's-not-that-smart)</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2ddae32de417/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:alevin"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:financial-engineering"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:correlation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:not-learning-from-data"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:it's-not-rocket-science-(no-really"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:-it's-not-that-smart)"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2008/12/11/my-least-favorite-interview-question/">
    <title>My Least Favorite Interview Question » Absolutely No Machete Juggling</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-24T23:08:35+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nomachetejuggling.com/2008/12/11/my-least-favorite-interview-question/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["I have no idea what the interviewer’s expectations are, so I have to guess. I have, essentially, a 50/50 shot at guessing correctly. To make matters worse, my answer will likely go through a number of different interviewers, and I have a 50/50 shot at having guessed correctly with each of them. Assuming that a single “no” from one of the interviewers means I don’t get a job offer, having 2 interviewers gives me a 25% chance of success. Three interviewers gives me a 12.5% chance. A team of 6 or 7 interviewers (extremely common in up-and-coming companies) gives me virtually no chance at all."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Nudge programming interview hiring specification assumptions project-management business-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:2962542e9d13/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Nudge"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:hiring"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:specification"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001226.html">
    <title>Coding Horror: Are You An Expert?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-02-21T12:56:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001226.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[[indirect but key]
"Practice, practice, practice!
Don't confuse experience with expertise.
Don't trust folklore -- but learn it anyway.
Take nothing on faith. Own your methodology.
Drive your own education -- no one else will.
Reputation = Money. Build and protect your reputation.
Relentlessly gather resources, materials, and tools.
Establish your standards and ethics.
Avoid certifications that trivialize the craft.
Associate with demanding colleagues.
Write, speak, and always tell the truth as you see it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>expertise learning-by-doing teams project-management social-norms assumptions skepticism self-image pragmatism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:effef8809829/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:expertise"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:learning-by-doing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:teams"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:project-management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:skepticism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:self-image"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pragmatism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009257.html">
    <title>Worldchanging: Lazy Dystopias</title>
    <dc:date>2008-12-31T12:58:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.worldchanging.com/archives/009257.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["The biggest problem with dystopian fiction is not its pessimism. I do think there's a serious issue about who's interests are best served by making people fear the future, but I think the biggest problem with most dystopian fiction is its laziness and derivative quality. Lazy futures act like visionary static, crackling and dirtying the signal-to-noise ratio, making it harder not only for truly insightful futures to be found, but corrupting the ability of normal people to see why those visions are worth understanding."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>dystopia futurism cliché sustainability lifestyle prediction pessimism assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:35986161c492/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:dystopia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:futurism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cliché"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:lifestyle"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prediction"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pessimism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://harpers.org/archive/2005/05/0080538">
    <title>Let there be markets:</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-15T12:30:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://harpers.org/archive/2005/05/0080538</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[“Post-autistic economics” (PAE) is the name now taken by those few economists who hope to rescue the discipline from the neoclassical model; the name is an homage to the dissident French students, whose manifesto called the standard model “autistic.” It is a hilariously apt (albeit mildly offensive) diagnosis, and it could be just as well applied to Homo economicus himself, the economic actor envisioned by the neoclassical theory, who performs dazzling calculations of utility maximization despite being entirely unable to communicate with his fellow man.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>economics academia cultural-norms assumptions modeling bounded-rationality anthropology-of-science</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:6011522c0f06/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:modeling"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bounded-rationality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anthropology-of-science"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html">
    <title>The Myth of Print Culture: Essays on ... - Google Book Search</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-14T22:28:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://books.google.com/books?printsec=frontcover&amp;id=MrsR88JvxOcC&amp;output=html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["...How are such things as editions, states, variants, or even the book itself to be discussed? To what extent is a printed book singular? And to what extent does the (inaccurate) scholarly assumption that it is not, enable reasonable and useful discussion of such objects to proceed?"
]]></description>
<dc:subject>via:britta books bibliomania scholarship models academia Platonism printing publishing assumptions cultural-norms relevance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:40cc52f6b323/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:britta"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:books"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bibliomania"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:scholarship"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:models"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:academia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Platonism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:printing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:relevance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.interfluidity.com/posts/1160447599.shtml">
    <title>Interfluidity :: Is the Prime Rate a Scam?</title>
    <dc:date>2008-10-12T13:12:42+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.interfluidity.com/posts/1160447599.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:tsuomela economics visualization planning public-policy standards cultural-norms assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5b86c1a2c7fc/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:tsuomela"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:visualization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:planning"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:public-policy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:standards"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://evolvingwe.com/business/7-things-you-can-t-say-on-the-internet/">
    <title>7 things you can't say on the Internet : evolvingWe</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-24T11:12:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://evolvingwe.com/business/7-things-you-can-t-say-on-the-internet/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[...which are all one thing: MORE DIVERSITY NEEDED ON ALL FRONTS. That's it.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>social-norms assumptions online advertising Google worklife business-culture</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:869dc77262e9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:online"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:advertising"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:worklife"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://publishing2.com/2008/06/04/what-newspapers-still-dont-understand-about-the-web/">
    <title>What Newspapers Still Don’t Understand About The Web - Publishing 2.0</title>
    <dc:date>2008-06-05T11:30:55+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://publishing2.com/2008/06/04/what-newspapers-still-dont-understand-about-the-web/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["It was a brilliant web-native news and information effort — BURIED three layers deep, where I couldn’t FIND it."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>newspapers web2.0 cultural-norms assumptions business-culture publishing media design editing</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:bc2eda0d99b7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:newspapers"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:publishing"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:media"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:editing"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.boardwalkcreative.com/photo_gallery.php">
    <title>About the Boardwalk Creative Center</title>
    <dc:date>2008-05-06T11:51:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.boardwalkcreative.com/photo_gallery.php</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Kindergarten was long ago. But it seems to be evoked strongly. Sheesh....
]]></description>
<dc:subject>&quot;creatives&quot; rental business-model prejudice bias assumptions</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:a582b0efa7ce/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:&quot;creatives&quot;"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rental"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:prejudice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.existenceiswonderful.com/2008/02/no-singing-allowed-assumptions-and.html">
    <title>Existence is Wonderful: No Singing Allowed: Assumptions and Other Nonsense</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-02T15:46:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.existenceiswonderful.com/2008/02/no-singing-allowed-assumptions-and.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["Basically, people who aren't as affected by the pervasive background assumptions that permeate the surrounding culture tend to not see the backgound at all."
]]></description>
<dc:subject>assumptions civil-rights cultural-norms social-norms law rights identity mobs</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:5b18e0e76cc3/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:civil-rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:rights"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:identity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:mobs"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2007/09/03/">
    <title>The Man in Blue &gt; There are no social networks</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-03T17:15:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://themaninblue.com/writing/perspective/2007/09/03/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>via:mitten social-norms social-networks business-model community communication collaboration user-experience assumptions anthropology sociology social-engineering</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:e6f9a51d3285/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:via:mitten"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-networks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:business-model"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:community"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:communication"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:collaboration"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:user-experience"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:anthropology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:social-engineering"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://metacool.typepad.com/metacool/2007/06/john_lilly_the_.html">
    <title>metacool: Words to live by</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-08T20:08:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://metacool.typepad.com/metacool/2007/06/john_lilly_the_.html</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><dc:subject>corporations openness markets assumptions open-source new-landscape</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:4e4ff3fad2bf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:corporations"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:openness"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:markets"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:open-source"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:new-landscape"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.relevancellc.com/2007/6/2/ruby-vs-java-myth-1-project-size">
    <title>Relevance: Ruby vs. Java Myth #1: Project Size</title>
    <dc:date>2007-06-06T00:52:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.relevancellc.com/2007/6/2/ruby-vs-java-myth-1-project-size</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nice post, but the comments have the highest crap/word count I've seen in many months. Something about Big Shop Programmers? Work culture is icky; let's just *do work* instead.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>Ruby Rails RoR java programming development productivity management software cultural-norms assumptions bias</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:8cbbcc6f140d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Ruby"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:Rails"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:RoR"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:java"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:programming"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:productivity"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:management"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:software"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:bias"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://devgrind.com/2007/04/25/how-to-not-solve-a-sudoku/">
    <title>devgrind » How to not solve a Sudoku</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-26T23:11:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://devgrind.com/2007/04/25/how-to-not-solve-a-sudoku/</link>
    <dc:creator>Vaguery</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Some people cannot discern pedagogy from earnest geekitude. It's a framing issue: people who think "this is trivial!" are clearly making that the truth, about their dismissal of others' work... or themselves.
]]></description>
<dc:subject>pedagogy cultural-norms development agility algorithms design goals objectives benchmarking assumptions cluelessness</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/b:065d7cb53125/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:pedagogy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cultural-norms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:development"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:agility"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:algorithms"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:design"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:goals"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:objectives"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:benchmarking"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:assumptions"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Vaguery/t:cluelessness"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>