<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (PhilK)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from PhilK</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/38245724.html"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/38245724.html">
    <title>Hoover Institution - Policy Review - Is Food the  New Sex?</title>
    <dc:date>2009-03-31T12:48:20+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/38245724.html</link>
    <dc:creator>PhilK</dc:creator><dc:subject>food sex morality sexuality culture interesting sociology society analysis</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/b:929bed4d2283/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:food"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:sex"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:morality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:sexuality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:culture"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:interesting"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:sociology"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:society"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:PhilK/t:analysis"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>