<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (McChris)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from McChris</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/26/Comcast-FCC-Hearing-Strategy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://foureyedmonsters.com/neutrality/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=962027"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.clamormagazine.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;Product_Code=NEUTRALITY&amp;Category_Code=GR&amp;Store_Code=BTM"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/index.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a27bdb16-5ecd-11db-afac-0000779e2340.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060803/0034240.shtml"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&amp;askthisid=00219"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/521"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/511"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/30304"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/357"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/317"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/179"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.networkingpipeline.com/blog/archives/2006/03/fcc_chief_att_c.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://blogs.cio.com/node/209"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=986"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4700430.stm"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/26/Comcast-FCC-Hearing-Strategy">
    <title>Portfolio: Comcast F.C.C. Hearing Strategy</title>
    <dc:date>2008-02-26T22:18:59+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.portfolio.com/news-markets/top-5/2008/02/26/Comcast-FCC-Hearing-Strategy</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The cable operator paid people off the street to pack an FCC hearing on its network discrimination practices, keeping critics and activists from attending or speaking at the hearing.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality telecom cable FCC astroturf</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:6da0ea56c45a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:cable"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:FCC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:astroturf"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi">
    <title>Q&amp;A: Stanford applies a clean slate to the Internet</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-26T14:38:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.networkworld.com/cgi-bin/mailto/x.cgi</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[NetworkWorld interviews Stanford professor Nick McKeown about his groups vision for a smarter, more secure internet; too bad it won't have anything like network neutrality.]]></description>
<dc:subject>interview spam networkneutrality network</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:bc908b3d757a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:interview"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:spam"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:network"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://foureyedmonsters.com/neutrality/">
    <title>Four Eyed Monsters: “Humanity Lobotomy”</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-24T07:13:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://foureyedmonsters.com/neutrality/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[You should watch this video that compiles clips to make a case for networkneutrality. The most interesting part is how the Final Cut file is available for download.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality video FCC media</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:dc72c9df00ea/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:video"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:FCC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:media"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=962027">
    <title>SSRN: Wireless Network Neutrality by Tim Wu</title>
    <dc:date>2007-02-12T18:03:40+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=962027</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><dc:subject>networkneutrality publicpolicy to:read law wifi</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:9a1b0f24d937/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:to:read"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:law"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:wifi"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.clamormagazine.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;Product_Code=NEUTRALITY&amp;Category_Code=GR&amp;Store_Code=BTM">
    <title>Clamor infoshop: &quot;Without Net Neutrality&quot; stickers</title>
    <dc:date>2006-11-05T00:12:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.clamormagazine.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&amp;Product_Code=NEUTRALITY&amp;Category_Code=GR&amp;Store_Code=BTM</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Cool network neutrality stickers.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality sticker activism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:7a63bec7af8d/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:sticker"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:activism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/index.html">
    <title>Moyers on America: The Net @ Risk</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-20T17:38:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.pbs.org/moyers/moyersonamerica/net/index.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Our state media was nice enough to put Bill Moyers' special on network neutrality in full online. (via donturn)]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality telecom publicpolicy TVontheWeb FCC</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:584df03070b5/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:TVontheWeb"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:FCC"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a27bdb16-5ecd-11db-afac-0000779e2340.html">
    <title>FT.com: Congress must keep broadband competition alive</title>
    <dc:date>2006-10-19T18:06:53+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/a27bdb16-5ecd-11db-afac-0000779e2340.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Larry Lessig advocates network neutrality in this editorial.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality business economics politicaleconomy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:9a766ac107b4/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politicaleconomy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://techdirt.com/articles/20060803/0034240.shtml">
    <title>How About Shaming Telcos Into Remaining Neutral?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-08-03T17:41:31+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://techdirt.com/articles/20060803/0034240.shtml</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A new technology enables users to test the relative neutrality of an ISP, opening the possibility of shaming telcos into operating neutral networks.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality hack telecom activism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:60391ee503de/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:hack"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:activism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&amp;askthisid=00219">
    <title>Why is Congress considering such anti-consumer telecom bills?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-26T18:57:03+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://niemanwatchdog.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=ask_this.view&amp;askthisid=00219</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This article details some of the issues at stake for the telecom companies with the new round of regulation in Congress. I was not aware of the issues surrounding the Universal Service Fund.]]></description>
<dc:subject>telecom networkneutrality publicpolicy astroturf business</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:68afc58d2edf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:astroturf"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/521">
    <title>Mr. Stevens' wild ride, through a &quot;series of tubes&quot;</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-11T23:15:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/521</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Nice chronology of the online response to Alaska Senator Ted Steven's speech comparing the Internet to a "series of tubes." If they had only used that Ajax framework used in the JFK timeline, my life would be complete.]]></description>
<dc:subject>history meme publicpolicy networkneutrality blog</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:1676b8bd6e20/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:history"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:meme"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:blog"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/511">
    <title>Why Antitrust Doesn't Cut It for NN (but why Google has to pretend)</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-06T02:43:46+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/511</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><dc:subject>networkneutrality google publicpolicy anti-trust law</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:7faa3ba1fb49/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:anti-trust"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:law"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499">
    <title>27B Stroke 6: Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) explains the Internet</title>
    <dc:date>2006-07-03T18:09:23+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/?entry_id=1512499</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This has been posted everywhere, but if you haven't read it yet, you must. I don't fault senior-citizen senators for not being up on technology developments, but they are responsible for hiring staffers that understand the issues.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality news politics stupid</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:54089e30a685/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:news"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:stupid"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/30304">
    <title>Boiling the Frog – a Net Neutrality Metaphor</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-31T23:26:21+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tpmcafe.com/node/30304</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This article provides useful insights into the political strategies behind the telco's efforts to implement network discrimination.]]></description>
<dc:subject>politics publicpolicy telecom networkneutrality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:78124f8836cb/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/357">
    <title>A 2006 Campaign Ad</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-18T18:53:12+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/357</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The telco lobby is considering running ads using the threat of child predators to spread FUD about network neutrality. Too bad the Christian Coalition has come out in support of neutrality.]]></description>
<dc:subject>lies telecom politics networkneutrality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:ee5318624501/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:lies"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/317">
    <title>Net Neutrality (or the lack of) in the Draft Senate Telecom Bill</title>
    <dc:date>2006-05-01T21:32:58+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/317</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Proposed wording regarding network neutrality in the senate bill. I guess it's codifying the Senate's intention to look into net neutrality issues, rather than putting net neutrality into law.]]></description>
<dc:subject>publicpolicy politicaleconomy politics networkneutrality</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:7ba271852117/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politicaleconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/179">
    <title>Public Knowledge - A Very Dispiriting Day</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-07T04:15:11+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/179</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The House Telecom Commitee resoundingly rejected maintaining network neutrality in a vote today. Democrats were as bad as Republicans at giving handouts to major telcos.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality telecom politics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:0addb1e8c0ca/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.networkingpipeline.com/blog/archives/2006/03/fcc_chief_att_c.html">
    <title>FCC Chief: AT&amp;T Can Limit Net Bandwidth</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-23T21:07:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.networkingpipeline.com/blog/archives/2006/03/fcc_chief_att_c.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Blog post says that Kevin Martin has come out in favor of network discrimination, allowing AT&T and other to charge Google, Vonage, and others for traffic on their networks.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality publicpolicy telecom FCC</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:d3e89dddb9e6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:FCC"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://blogs.cio.com/node/209">
    <title>Who owns the Internet? We have a map that shows you.</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-23T20:14:26+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://blogs.cio.com/node/209</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[CIO Magazine has a .pdf map of what companies control various parts of the Internet backbone.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality business politicaleconomy publicpolicy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:c2b139b2c745/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politicaleconomy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=986">
    <title>Freedom to Tinker  » Blog Archive   » Nuts and Bolts of Net Discrimination, Part 2</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-08T04:49:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/?p=986</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Ed Felten explains how the Net Discrimination scheme proposed by major ISPs might be implemented.]]></description>
<dc:subject>networkneutrality telecom publicpolicy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:e0e6cf46ed9a/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:telecom"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4700430.stm">
    <title>Why the net should stay neutral</title>
    <dc:date>2006-02-13T21:20:25+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/4700430.stm</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><dc:subject>networkneutrality publicpolicy socialjustice politicaleconomy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:6dd3edfd5060/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:networkneutrality"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:publicpolicy"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:socialjustice"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:politicaleconomy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>