<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (McChris)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from McChris</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/magazine/30Wikileaks-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/08/18/its-your-stuff-maybe-not/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2133120,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=networkfront"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/03/call_for_a_blog_1.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.spotscout.com/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/04/all-eyes-on-you-cellphone-cameras-cyber-shaming/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2006/12/ban_the_analyst.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/15/nytimes_ms_ban/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LostRemote/~3/22217575/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0315,sutton,43183,9.html"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/03/21/airing-dirty-laundry-engadgets-exclusionist-tactics-are-not-an-isolated-incident/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/magazine/30Wikileaks-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all">
    <title>The Times's Dealings With Julian Assange - NYTimes.com</title>
    <dc:date>2011-02-07T00:50:43+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/30/magazine/30Wikileaks-t.html?_r=2&amp;hp=&amp;pagewanted=all</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Bill Keller provides a behind-the-scenes account of the relationship between the Gray Lady and Wikileaks.]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikileaks journalism ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:ae932ee6544c/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:wikileaks"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/08/18/its-your-stuff-maybe-not/">
    <title>Dan Gilmor: It’s Your Stuff? Maybe Not</title>
    <dc:date>2007-09-04T05:18:38+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://citmedia.org/blog/2007/08/18/its-your-stuff-maybe-not/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA["the bigger issue is... whether the photos, text, videos, financial information and other things you put online are yours, or whether they end up belonging, in practice if not principle, to the company you use to store and/or display them.]]></description>
<dc:subject>labor Web2.0 google ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:ce3816d5b6aa/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:labor"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:Web2.0"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:google"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2133120,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=networkfront">
    <title>Guardian: Ethical shopping is just another way of showing how rich you are</title>
    <dc:date>2007-07-27T01:33:39+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,2133120,00.html?gusrc=rss&amp;feed=networkfront</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Here in Austin, green consumption sure seems like a lifestyle statement, but I wonder how else people can nudge global capital to implement green practices.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ethics sustainability economics environmentalism</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:86383c036b21/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:sustainability"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:economics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:environmentalism"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/03/call_for_a_blog_1.html">
    <title>O'Reilly Radar: Call for a Blogger's Code of Conduct</title>
    <dc:date>2007-04-01T17:28:04+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/03/call_for_a_blog_1.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Tim O'Reilly calls for a blogger's code in response to the harassment of Kathy Sierra. The problem is that trolls and griefers aren't going to follow the rules.]]></description>
<dc:subject>blog ethics surveillance</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:9be968b49d56/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:surveillance"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.spotscout.com/">
    <title>SpotScout Inc. - Parking the Mobile Generation™</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-07T18:53:45+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.spotscout.com/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This online marketplace for information about parking spots raises ethical issues of how commons are shared.]]></description>
<dc:subject>transportation NYC ethics Web2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:bce4234e4c96/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:transportation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:NYC"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:Web2.0"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/04/all-eyes-on-you-cellphone-cameras-cyber-shaming/">
    <title>Michael Zimmer: All Eyes On You: Cellphone cameras &amp; cyber-shaming</title>
    <dc:date>2007-03-04T23:25:17+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://michaelzimmer.org/2007/03/04/all-eyes-on-you-cellphone-cameras-cyber-shaming/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[I do wonder how cyber-shaming is different from sousveillance, but I do think this practice creates interesting and important ethical issues.]]></description>
<dc:subject>ethics surveillance privacy</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:4b8018263bd7/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:surveillance"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:privacy"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2006/12/ban_the_analyst.html">
    <title>InformationWeek Weblog: Ban The Analysts! Or Not?</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-18T17:22:34+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2006/12/ban_the_analyst.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[A reporter from the venerable trade magazine explains her position on the analyst issue. I tend to agree that some analysts are beholden to a particular platform, while others will entertainingly talk trash about a company or product.]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism ethics business</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:7963c530f677/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/15/nytimes_ms_ban/">
    <title>NY Times bans Microsoft analysts from Microsoft stories</title>
    <dc:date>2006-12-18T17:19:10+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/12/15/nytimes_ms_ban/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[This Register story is fairly interesting - I don't think it should be a surprise that many analyst firms are shills for the companies they discuss, but the NYTimes probably should have a different set of standards than the trades.]]></description>
<dc:subject>journalism ethics business</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:358240cae26e/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:journalism"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LostRemote/~3/22217575/">
    <title>Editorial: Nancy’s disgrace</title>
    <dc:date>2006-09-14T19:40:27+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/LostRemote/~3/22217575/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Steve Safran sounds off on how CNN Headline News commentator Nancy Grace refuses to accept any responsibility after a woman committed suicide after an agressive interview.]]></description>
<dc:subject>TV cable crime ethics news</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:659e45708f6b/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:TV"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:cable"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:crime"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:news"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp">
    <title>The real bias in Wikipedia: a response to David Shariatmadari by Robert McHenry</title>
    <dc:date>2006-06-11T00:57:02+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-edemocracy/wikipedia_bias_3621.jsp</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[The Encyclopaedia Britannica editor turned professional troll splits hairs over the Countering Systemic Bias Wikiproject.]]></description>
<dc:subject>wikipedia globalization ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:ca8deaf12cbf/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:wikipedia"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:globalization"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0315,sutton,43183,9.html">
    <title>Please Read to a Dead Iraqi Child</title>
    <dc:date>2006-04-07T23:47:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0315,sutton,43183,9.html</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[We're talking about war coverage in my TV class this week, and I might pass along this classic cartoon satrizing Laura Bush's literacy intiatives.]]></description>
<dc:subject>comics satire anti-war thereal ethics</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:bca3fe5a4ef6/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:comics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:satire"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:anti-war"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:thereal"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/03/21/airing-dirty-laundry-engadgets-exclusionist-tactics-are-not-an-isolated-incident/">
    <title>OhGizmo! » Airing Dirty Laundry: Engadget’s Exclusionist Tactics Are NOT An Isolated Incident</title>
    <dc:date>2006-03-23T23:25:19+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.ohgizmo.com/2006/03/21/airing-dirty-laundry-engadgets-exclusionist-tactics-are-not-an-isolated-incident/</link>
    <dc:creator>McChris</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Interesting blog post alleging the AOL-owned gadget blog Engadget has a "blacklist." If a blacklisted blog breaks a gadget story, Engadget editors will hold off on publishing until a non-blacklisted site reports the same story.]]></description>
<dc:subject>power blog ethics business co-optation news</dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/b:b61121a728e2/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:power"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:blog"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:ethics"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:business"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:co-optation"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:McChris/t:news"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>