<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
 <rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://pinboard.in">
    <title>Pinboard (Aetles)</title>
    <link>https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/public/</link>
    <description>recent bookmarks from Aetles</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4145"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/best-of-both-worlds-setting-up-wi-fi-for-ios-on-2-4-and-5ghz/"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.tuaw.com/2012/01/31/in-pictures-airport-utility-6-0s-missing-features/"/>
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel><item rdf:about="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4145">
    <title>Wi-Fi base stations: Extending the range of your wireless network by adding additional Wi-Fi base stations</title>
    <dc:date>2013-02-08T22:59:49+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4145</link>
    <dc:creator>Aetles</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Before you add additional Wi-fi base stations to your network, you should consider whether or not you really need to.

Adding Wi-Fi base stations when it is unnecessary can reduce Wi-Fi throughput because the Wi-Fi network will require more data management overhead. The network configuration also becomes more complex. In the case of a wirelessly extended network, throughput may be reduced to less than 60 percent of that of a single device. The general rule is to keep the Wi-Fi network as simple as possible. You can accomplish this by using the minimum number of Wi-Fi base stations required to service the physical network area and by using Ethernet wherever possible.

Extending the range of your Wi-Fi network by connecting Wi-Fi base stations together using Ethernet is always the best option, and will provide the best throughput. ]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple network wifi airport</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/b:9e0d4a2890b9/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:network"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:wifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:airport"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/best-of-both-worlds-setting-up-wi-fi-for-ios-on-2-4-and-5ghz/">
    <title>Best of both worlds: Setting up Wi-Fi for iOS on 2.4 and 5GHz | Ars Technica</title>
    <dc:date>2012-11-10T13:24:18+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/11/best-of-both-worlds-setting-up-wi-fi-for-ios-on-2-4-and-5ghz/</link>
    <dc:creator>Aetles</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[For a while, it seemed that Wi-Fi was becoming a victim of its own success. In many cities, there are numerous active Wi-Fi networks on those preciously few non-overlapping channels—that's in addition to microwaves, bluetooth, cordless phones, and baby monitors, which all share the 2.4GHz band.

But since about 2007, Apple has also built support for 802.11n Wi-Fi on the 5GHz band into its computers and Airport line of Wi-Fi base stations. Now, the iPhone 5 and the latest iPod touch also have that support. (The iPad has had it since day one.) So, how do you set up a Wi-Fi network that makes the most of this confluence of Wi-Fi bands?]]></description>
<dc:subject>arstechnica wifi airport</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/b:2e567f20d284/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:arstechnica"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:wifi"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:airport"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
<item rdf:about="http://www.tuaw.com/2012/01/31/in-pictures-airport-utility-6-0s-missing-features/">
    <title>In pictures: AirPort Utility 6.0's missing features | TUAW - The Unofficial Apple Weblog</title>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T13:21:06+00:00</dc:date>
    <link>http://www.tuaw.com/2012/01/31/in-pictures-airport-utility-6-0s-missing-features/</link>
    <dc:creator>Aetles</dc:creator><description><![CDATA[Apple's new AirPort Utility 6.0 for OS X was released yesterday, bringing over the slick UI from its pre-existing iOS version -- but as my colleague Chris reported, it also removes access to a number of features in the process. At the same time, Apple are still hosting downloads for the older version of the tool which still has the full feature set. Predictably, there's been some indignant fallout from this admittedly curious decision, but what sorts of features are missing, and should you care? I loaded up the old and new version of the tools side-by-side to see what I could find out.]]></description>
<dc:subject>apple airport extreme express</dc:subject>
<dc:source>https://pinboard.in/</dc:source>
<dc:identifier>https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/b:dd9d4b92899f/</dc:identifier>
<taxo:topics><rdf:Bag>	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:apple"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:airport"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:extreme"/>
	<rdf:li rdf:resource="https://pinboard.in/u:Aetles/t:express"/>
</rdf:Bag></taxo:topics>
</item>
</rdf:RDF>